nope
Eubacteria have prokaryotic cells. Eubacteria IS Kingdom Bacteria! The Eu- was there to distinguish it from Archaebacteria when Archaebacteria were in the same kingdom as Eubacteria and not in its own kingdom of Archae, as they are now. (The old kingdom that contained both Eubacteria and Archaebacteria was called Kingdom Monera)
Eubacteria and archaebacteria are prokaryotic organisms, while organisms in other kingdoms are eukaryotic. Eubacteria have a peptidoglycan cell wall, while archaebacteria have a different type of cell wall. Archaebacteria live in extreme environments, while eubacteria are found in a wide range of habitats.
Archaebacteria and eubacteria are two different domains.Domains are the highest (widest) levels of the taxonomic hierarchy, kingdoms come below this level so be careful not to refer to them like this.
Well, if you're talking about animal kingdoms, it'd be eubacteria and archaebacteria. They're both bacteria. I was just learning about this in science class yesterday! :D
No, plants and birds are not from the same kingdom. Plants belong to the kingdom Plantae, while birds belong to the kingdom Animalia. They are also not from the same species, as species are a more specific classification within a kingdom, and plants and birds have very different characteristics and biology.
because there not the same
Eubacteria have prokaryotic cells. Eubacteria IS Kingdom Bacteria! The Eu- was there to distinguish it from Archaebacteria when Archaebacteria were in the same kingdom as Eubacteria and not in its own kingdom of Archae, as they are now. (The old kingdom that contained both Eubacteria and Archaebacteria was called Kingdom Monera)
They use to belong to the same kingdom: Moneran, but scientists thought that they were important enough to belong in their own kingdom, especially since archaebacteria is the oldest microorganism. So the answer is No, they belong in different kingdoms. (:
Eubacteria and archaebacteria are prokaryotic organisms, while organisms in other kingdoms are eukaryotic. Eubacteria have a peptidoglycan cell wall, while archaebacteria have a different type of cell wall. Archaebacteria live in extreme environments, while eubacteria are found in a wide range of habitats.
Archaebacteria and eubacteria are two different domains.Domains are the highest (widest) levels of the taxonomic hierarchy, kingdoms come below this level so be careful not to refer to them like this.
That is incorrect. Eubacteria is a kingdom that contains prokaryotic organisms, such as bacteria, while Animalia is a kingdom that contains multicellular eukaryotic organisms, such as animals. They are two distinct biological classifications with different types of organisms.
No, organisms in the same kingdom do not have to belong to the same domain. Kingdom is a broader classification level than domain. Organisms in the same kingdom share similar characteristics and traits, but they can belong to different domains, which are higher-level classifications.
Taxonomically, pigs belong to Kingdom Animalia, same as sea urchins and humans.
Well, if you're talking about animal kingdoms, it'd be eubacteria and archaebacteria. They're both bacteria. I was just learning about this in science class yesterday! :D
Same kingdom as humans. Invertebrates phylum of Echinoderms, specific Asteroidea.
Yes. All snakes are animals in the kingdom Anamalia.
Yes, animals can belong to the same kingdom if they share similar characteristics related to their structure and function, such as having multicellular bodies, being heterotrophic, and lacking cell walls. This kingdom is known as Animalia.