Yes, the production of light can indicate that a physical change has occurred, but it's more commonly associated with chemical changes. In a physical change, light may be emitted due to phenomena like friction or the movement of particles. However, in chemical reactions, light often results from energy release as chemical bonds are formed or broken. Thus, while light production can be a sign of a change, it is not definitive for identifying whether that change is physical or chemical.
yes it s an evidence that a chemical change has been occurred
no unless there is a chemical change but there isn't. only a physical change has occurred
Evidence of a chemical change refers to observable signs that a chemical reaction has occurred. This can include color change, formation of gas or precipitate, temperature change, or production of light. These changes indicate that the substances involved in the reaction have undergone a chemical transformation at the molecular level.
If form changes but identity doesn't change then it is a physical change.
The production of smoke from something burning would be a sign of a chemical change. Broken pieces, change in shape, or change in state are all physical changes.
yes it s an evidence that a chemical change has been occurred
WEA
no unless there is a chemical change but there isn't. only a physical change has occurred
Evidence of a chemical change refers to observable signs that a chemical reaction has occurred. This can include color change, formation of gas or precipitate, temperature change, or production of light. These changes indicate that the substances involved in the reaction have undergone a chemical transformation at the molecular level.
If form changes but identity doesn't change then it is a physical change.
The production of smoke from something burning would be a sign of a chemical change. Broken pieces, change in shape, or change in state are all physical changes.
physical
When a change in behaviors has occurred..
Changes such as a change in state (solid to liquid), change in color, change in odor, change in solubility, or change in temperature do not provide direct evidence that a chemical reaction has occurred. These changes can be indicative of a physical change rather than a chemical change. To confirm a chemical reaction, additional evidence such as the formation of new substances, evolution of gas, or consumption of reactants is necessary.
No, a physical change refers to a change in the form or appearance of a substance without any change in its chemical composition. If new substances are formed with different chemical properties, then a chemical change has occurred, not a physical change.
A physical change has occurred.
hahahahhaa