Mount Tamburok is not a well-known cinder cone volcano. It is primarily recognized for its stratovolcano characteristics, with a complex structure formed from various volcanic materials. Cinder cones are typically smaller, steep-sided cones built from the eruption of lava fragments, while stratovolcanoes like Tamburok have a more layered buildup from both explosive and effusive eruptions. Therefore, Mount Tamburok does not fit the definition of a cinder cone.
Mount Kenya is neither a composite cone, cinder cone, nor a shield cone. It is a complex stratovolcano made up of layers of lava and ash.
No Mount Garibaldi is a stratovolcano.
No. Vesuvius is a stratovolcano.
Mount Fuji is a stratovolcano, which is a composite volcano formed by both lava flows and explosive eruptions. It is not a cinder cone or shield volcano.
Tambora was a composite cone.
No. No cinder cone is even close to that size. Mount Rainier is a stratovolcano.
No. Mount Hood is a stratovolcano.
Yes
Mount Kenya is neither a composite cone, cinder cone, nor a shield cone. It is a complex stratovolcano made up of layers of lava and ash.
Some cinder cone volcanoes in the Philippines are Musuan, or Calayao Volcano, and Mayon Volcano.
No. Mount Redoubt is a stratovolcano.
No Mount Garibaldi is a stratovolcano.
No. Vesuvius is a stratovolcano.
it is a stratovolcano
Mount fox is a cinder cone, i believe.
Mount Paricutin is a cinder cone volcano
Mount Paricutin in Mexico