It is both because soil is not living But, it also has dead organisms in it.
A desert is a mixture of both biotic and abiotic factors. Soil, sand, rock, water, air and light are abiotic while plants and animals are biotic.
soil can not be both biotic,or abiotic. Because "biotic" means "living,or alive" And abiotic means "dead,or not alive" Therefore,soil can only be "abiotic" because it's not living.wrong because soil can be both because what lives in the soil (bacteria,ants,and ect...) are living things meaning that the bacteria ants and ect.. are living things but even though soil is abiotic what makes it both is that there are ;iving things inside the soil so that's why it is both biotic and abiotic
its a abiotic because its not a living thing
Prairie soil is considered an abiotic factor. Abiotic factors are non-living components of an ecosystem, such as soil, temperature, and water. Biotic factors, on the other hand, are living organisms that interact with each other and their environment.
Biotic factors, such as living organisms, interact with abiotic factors, which are the non-living components of an ecosystem, like water, soil, and climate. While abiotic factors can exist independently of biotic factors, the presence of biotic factors often influences the characteristics and availability of abiotic factors. For example, plants (biotic) can affect soil quality (abiotic) through nutrient cycling. Thus, while not strictly necessary for abiotic factors to exist, biotic factors play a crucial role in shaping and sustaining the environment.
animals are biotic and soil is Abiotic
Soil, sand, rocks, water are all abiotic. All plants and animals are biotic.
abiotic: sunlight, soil fertility, biotic: predators, preys for food supply,
A desert is a mixture of both biotic and abiotic factors. Soil, sand, rock, water, air and light are abiotic while plants and animals are biotic.
water and soil
soil can not be both biotic,or abiotic. Because "biotic" means "living,or alive" And abiotic means "dead,or not alive" Therefore,soil can only be "abiotic" because it's not living.wrong because soil can be both because what lives in the soil (bacteria,ants,and ect...) are living things meaning that the bacteria ants and ect.. are living things but even though soil is abiotic what makes it both is that there are ;iving things inside the soil so that's why it is both biotic and abiotic
There are no such things as being abiotic or biotic. Either your a living organism (biotic) or your not (abiotic). For example tempurature is abiotic,,therefore it cannot be biotic, it is not a living thing. And a tree is a biotic factor,,therefore it cannot be alive as well as dead.
No, it's abiotic. Abiotic means non-living. It's non-living because it doesn't live. Plants are biotic, but not soil. Soil only has nutrients, not cells. Hahahahahaha. I'm jk I don't know if soil has cells or not whatever, but I'm 100% sure that soil is abiotic.
Yes, soil contains both biotic (living) and abiotic (non-living) components. Biotic components include microorganisms, plants, and small animals, while abiotic components include minerals, water, air, and organic matter. Together, these components contribute to the overall health and fertility of the soil.
its a abiotic because its not a living thing
It is both because soil is not living But, it also has dead organisms in it.
Prairie soil is considered an abiotic factor. Abiotic factors are non-living components of an ecosystem, such as soil, temperature, and water. Biotic factors, on the other hand, are living organisms that interact with each other and their environment.