Yes, everyday.
The experiments that supposedly proved spontaneous generation likely lacked proper controls, used contaminated samples, or made incorrect conclusions. Inaccuracies in the experimental setup or interpretation undermine the validity of the results suggesting spontaneous generation. It is important to critically evaluate the experimental design and methodology to establish the credibility of such claims.
The requirement of using a sealed flask was not necessary for Pasteur to disprove spontaneous generation. Instead, he used swan-necked flasks to prevent microbes from entering, demonstrating that air could still reach the broth without leading to microbial growth.
yes he did
In Louis Pasteur's experiments on spontaneous generation, the control group consisted of flasks filled with nutrient broth that were left open to the air, allowing potential microbial contamination. These flasks showed microbial growth, supporting the idea that microorganisms came from the environment rather than spontaneously generated. In contrast, the experimental group used swan-necked flasks that prevented airborne contaminants from entering while still allowing air circulation, which remained free of microbial growth, thus disproving spontaneous generation.
spontaneous generation- an impossibility. by law of science, living things only come from other living things. the theory of evolution basically starts with spontaneous generation. otherwise the law is faulty. and its a law. not a theory, a law.
spontaneous generation means the mistaken idea that living things arise from nonliving sources. so it has nothing to do with protecting your food.
The experiments that supposedly proved spontaneous generation likely lacked proper controls, used contaminated samples, or made incorrect conclusions. Inaccuracies in the experimental setup or interpretation undermine the validity of the results suggesting spontaneous generation. It is important to critically evaluate the experimental design and methodology to establish the credibility of such claims.
The requirement of using a sealed flask was not necessary for Pasteur to disprove spontaneous generation. Instead, he used swan-necked flasks to prevent microbes from entering, demonstrating that air could still reach the broth without leading to microbial growth.
Your mom was the first one. you ain't know?
yes he did
no
yes it is still used today
spontaneous generation- an impossibility. by law of science, living things only come from other living things. the theory of evolution basically starts with spontaneous generation. otherwise the law is faulty. and its a law. not a theory, a law.
the tank is still used today. For example the M1 Abrams is still used
long houses are not still used today
Believers in spontaneous generation might have argued that Redi's results were inconclusive because he did not account for all possible variables affecting the appearance of maggots in the meat. Without a control group for comparison, they could have claimed that other factors, not just the presence of flies, might have influenced the generation of maggots.
Yes, steam engines are still used in some modern industries and technologies, particularly in power generation and certain types of transportation.