I think that there were empty spaces in the model.
The best evidence that particles of matter are constantly moving comes from the observation of Brownian motion. This is the random movement of particles suspended in a fluid, caused by collisions with molecules of the surrounding medium. The continuous, random motion of these particles provides strong evidence for the kinetic theory of matter.
Brownian motion is evidence of the random movement of particles suspended in a fluid, caused by collisions with the fluid's molecules. This phenomenon served as crucial evidence supporting the kinetic theory of matter, which states that all matter is made up of particles in constant motion.
Thomson had two pieces of evidence: 1- No matter what metal he used for the disk, the particles produced were indentical. 2- The particles had about 1/2000 the mass of a hydrogen, the lightest atom. These experiments provided the first evidence that atoms are made of even smaller particles.
Diffusion occurs because particles move randomly in all directions until they are evenly distributed. This can be explained by the particle model, which states that matter is made up of tiny particles that are constantly in motion. The movement of particles in diffusion supports the idea that substances are composed of particles that are constantly moving.
The two processes that provide evidence for the motion of particles of matter are diffusion, where particles move from areas of high concentration to areas of low concentration, and Brownian motion, where particles in a fluid medium exhibit random movement due to collisions with surrounding molecules.
J.J. Thomson provided evidence about the structure of an atom through his discovery of the electron using cathode ray tubes. His experiments showed that electrons are negatively charged particles and are present in all atoms, leading to the development of the plum pudding model of the atom.
The best evidence that particles of matter are constantly moving comes from the observation of Brownian motion. This is the random movement of particles suspended in a fluid, caused by collisions with molecules of the surrounding medium. The continuous, random motion of these particles provides strong evidence for the kinetic theory of matter.
Circumstantial evidence is evidence that implies a fact but does not directly prove it. It requires inference or deduction to connect it to a conclusion. In contrast, direct evidence directly proves a fact without the need for inference.
Thomson had two pieces of evidence: 1- No matter what metal he used for the disk, the particles produced were indentical. 2- The particles had about 1/2000 the mass of a hydrogen, the lightest atom. These experiments provided the first evidence that atoms are made of even smaller particles.
Thomson had two pieces of evidence: 1- No matter what metal he used for the disk, the particles produced were indentical. 2- The particles had about 1/2000 the mass of a hydrogen, the lightest atom. These experiments provided the first evidence that atoms are made of even smaller particles.
evidence that particles have spaces between each other
Circumstantial evidence is indirect evidence that implies a fact but does not directly prove it, while physical evidence is tangible evidence that can be directly observed or measured. In a criminal investigation, physical evidence is typically more reliable and persuasive than circumstantial evidence because it provides concrete proof of a fact.
The atom is far too small to ever be examined directly. The diameter of a typical nucleus is only about 1/100,000 of the diameter of the entire atom and if an atom were magnified until it was as large as a football stadium, the nucleus would be about the size of a grape. Nearly all evidence of an atom's structure has been theorized.
The atom is far too small to ever be examined directly. The diameter of a typical nucleus is only about 1/100,000 of the diameter of the entire atom and if an atom were magnified until it was as large as a football stadium, the nucleus would be about the size of a grape. Nearly all evidence of an atom's structure has been theorized.
Particles matter to forensic scientists because particles can leave behind evidence of the criminal. Particles, only regarded as dust for example and not fibres etc hold great significance and can identify if a body has been moved etc, along with evidence such as livor mortis etc
biochemical evidence anatomical evidence fossils vestigial structure embryological evidence
The evidence for the particle theory of matter is supported by the behavior of particles in the kinetic molecular theory, such as the diffusion of gases, Brownian motion, and the interaction of particles in chemical reactions. Additionally, the observation of subatomic particles like protons, neutrons, and electrons further solidifies the particle nature of matter. Experimental data from particle accelerators also provide evidence for the existence of various elementary particles.