It should be "property vested in," as "vested in" indicates ownership or control being placed in something or someone, while "vested to" is not grammatically correct.
Property relations in foraging societies are best termed as "communal" or "collective." In these societies, resources are typically shared among members rather than individually owned. Ownership is often vested in the community as a whole rather than in individual members.
Yes , it should or else it is a physical property
The city in which the property you are looking at should have a copy of the Plat map.
In order to evict any unwanted visitors from your property you should contact the appropriate authorities, in this case the police department, and request their assistance. You should also contact your legal representative who will be able to commence the correct legal procedures for eviction.
To make properties of a JavaBean component available to users, you should follow the JavaBean conventions by providing getter and setter methods for each property. The getter method should return the property's value, while the setter method should allow users to modify it. Additionally, properties should be private to encapsulate the data, ensuring that access is controlled through these public methods. Optionally, you can also provide support for property change listeners to notify users of any changes.
if a property is owned by a corporation where there is a sole officer, is it vested if there is a mortgage on that property?
Yes, your vested interest could be cut off.
The remainderman has full vested rights in the property.
yes
Well - this is kind of an ambiguous question. A Security Deed technically vests property in the Bank that is loaning the money to the property owner, and the Security Deed should be executed by any and all parties that may hold a vested interest in the property being encumbered at the time of encumbrance in order to be valid. The question you have asked is open for interpretation and really needs to be edited to be more specific. Perhaps you can elaborate a bit on the question?
receiver is someone appointed to whom is vested the legal right to receive property belonging to a company
I believe that any politician should be treated as any other working person. So the answer is no, I don't think they should be fully vested after 5 years of service.
Vested interest seems to be a legal term. It means that someone has the right to obtain access to various types of property. It also means a special interest in pushing things that carry personal advantage.
Deeds must be recorded in the land records for your jurisdiction. If you wish to make any changes in ownership you should consult with an attorney in your jurisdiction who can make certain the changes are made according to the laws in your jurisdiction.
The power vested in Harry in the movie Harry Potter. This is an example of vested in a sentence.
A dominant tenement is land that benefits from an easement on another's property. The servient tenement is the land over which the easement runs. Generally, when both properties become vested in one owner there is a merger of title and the easement is extinguished. However, you should always consult with an attorney in your jurisdiction, preferably the attorney who represented you at the time of your purchase.
Vested means "held" and unvested means the opposite. ex: Here are the powers vested in congress;....