Repeatable
If the parameters are not controlled in a scientific experiment, then one cannot be sure what the variables are. Unless you conduct the experiment in a closed environment with only only one variable, one's results can be confusing and inconclusive.
to represent the population.at random. -apex (;
Scientists typically communicate the results of an experiment through scientific journals, presentations at conferences, or by publishing their findings in peer-reviewed research papers. This allows other scientists to review, replicate, and build upon the work.
Theories
Yea gotta eat the butt
To be considered valid, the results of a scientific experiment must be reliable, reproducible, and based on sound methodology. This involves using appropriate controls, ensuring sample size is adequate, and minimizing biases. Additionally, the experiment should be peer-reviewed and subjected to scrutiny by the scientific community to confirm its findings. Ultimately, validity is established when results consistently align with established scientific principles and can be replicated by others.
a control group and statistical analysys of the resultsalso, to be considered valid, the results of a scientific experiment must be repeatable and still proven correct.
Yes, for an experiment's results to be valid and reliable, it must adhere to sound scientific principles such as having a clear hypothesis, using appropriate controls, ensuring reproducibility, and analyzing data accurately. Without following these principles, the results may be skewed or unreliable.
If the experiment is not reproducible, no one can perform the experiment independently to confirm the results.
A valid experiment is the one which is done on the basis of some facts and figures. The experiment which has a good statistical analysis is known to be valid experiment.step 3.
To ensure an experiment's results are valid, you must conduct multiple trials to account for variability and increase reliability. This helps to minimize potential errors and ensure that the results are consistent and reproducible.
The results of an experiment must be reproducible, meaning that they can be consistently obtained when the experiment is repeated by other researchers. Results should also be accurate, reflecting the true outcome of the experiment, and relevant to the research question being investigated. Additionally, results should be clearly presented and interpreted in the context of existing scientific knowledge.
To make your hypothesis considered scientific it must have testable and measurable results. Example: If you do an experiment and the results are testable and measurable another person would be able to do the exact same project and come out with the same results.
To make your hypothesis considered scientific it must have testable and measurable results. Example: If you do an experiment and the results are testable and measurable another person would be able to do the exact same project and come out with the same results.
To ensure an experiment is valid, it must have a clear hypothesis, controlled variables, and a reliable method for data collection. Random assignment of subjects helps reduce bias, while replication of the experiment allows for verification of results. Additionally, appropriate sample sizes enhance the reliability of the findings, ensuring that results can be generalized to a larger population.
If the parameters are not controlled in a scientific experiment, then one cannot be sure what the variables are. Unless you conduct the experiment in a closed environment with only only one variable, one's results can be confusing and inconclusive.
A control experiment provides a benchmark against which to compare the results of the main experiment. For example, to know if heating a material changes its resistance, you must be able to compare the results of the heated experiment to a copy in which the material was left unheated.