DNA can be used to match two species and determine if they are related or share a common ancestor. In addition, the existence of DNA itself is proof for evolution on a large scale - virtually all organisms share the same nucleic acid as the genetic code, leading scientists to the conclusion that all species shared a common ancestor at one time.
Some of the most well-known scientists are Isaac Newton, Albert Einstein, Charles Darwin, and Marie Curie. These individuals have made significant contributions in the fields of physics, evolution, and chemistry.
The evidence scientists have are fossil clues, plant clues, climate clues and rock clues. Fossil clues supported the idea because a certain fossil the Mesosaurus was found in two continents on opposite sides of the Earth and the only reason for that is if the lands came together at one time. Plant clues support the idea the same way fossil clues do, like the plant called a Glossopteris was found in different areas around the world. Climate clues support the idea because some of the fossils and plants from warmer climates were found in the Arctic. That explains why there are glaciers in tropical areas. Lastly rock clues support the idea because if the continents were once connected at one time, then the rocks that made up the continents should be in the same locations where they were joined.
Fossils show evidence of evolution by showing a picture to the past and through some methods how DNA of one animal may be similar to that of a modern animal.
The lack of a fossil record for some periods in Earth's history makes it challenging for scientists to understand and reconstruct past environments and biodiversity accurately. It can lead to gaps in the evolutionary timeline and limit our understanding of the organisms that lived during those times. Researchers often rely on other geological clues and indirect evidence to infer what life might have been like during those periods.
Some scientists with funny names include Dr. Dick van Dyke, Dr. Cherub Chirive, and Dr. Jack Offenbach.
No, some actually profess faith even despite the truth. That is fine.
AnswerNo, evolution is science. If scientists wish to hold religious beliefs they are free to do so - in fact there are some scientists who are Christians. AnswerCertainly not. Evolution believers can be christain, they can be anyone. Some throw words like "atheist" and "antichrist" or phrases like "you will go to hell" because of a threat to their beliefs. No one likes to be threatened. Religion is what some people hold on to, just as science and reason is sometimes what people hold to.
scientists study a lot about evolution. its a difficult job to do so they divide it to several types and study it individually. though several years of reserch they revealed a tons of detail about genes... hereditary dieseases . the do find out that some dieseases is transferred from a persona from their ancesters
Biologists, paleontologists, geneticists, and anthropologists are some of the scientists who study evolution. They analyze fossils, genetic data, and comparative anatomy to understand how species evolved over time. The theory of evolution was proposed by Charles Darwin in the 19th century, and his ideas laid the foundation for the study of evolution.
Well scientists believe that we evolved from the Apes, think of the era of the cave men that might give you some idea of what i mean.
Some of the most well-known scientists are Isaac Newton, Albert Einstein, Charles Darwin, and Marie Curie. These individuals have made significant contributions in the fields of physics, evolution, and chemistry.
Some time after the first stars lit off, so about 13.5 billion years ago.
Science is generally based on facts, so superstition is the last thing scientists care about. Some people do consider evolution to be a superstitious belief, and even the first evolution textbooks said to take the content of the book with faith.
People have gathered extensive information on horse evolution due to the discovery of some many variations of the horse skeleton. The skeleton will tell Archaeologists and scientists almost exactly what the animal was like.
It appears that evolution is not disputed because it is obviously in error - if it were, then scientists would have abandoned the theory long ago. It is disputed because some see the Theory of Evolution as inconsistent with a literal reading of the Bible and thus likely to undermine faith. For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
go search it up in the 39 clues wikia or ask some body like me but i won't tell you
Some context clues are poisoness affect and fluid