I'm assuming you mean unicellular organisms, because there is no such thing as a multicellular cell (one cell is one cell, no more, no less :P)
Anyway, to answer the question I think you were trying to pose here, a unicellular organism can multiply at rates that seem almost unimaginable in comparison to how fast multicellular organisms reproduce.
This ability offers several evolutionary advantages:
Because of the extremely rapid rate of replication, unicellular organisms can evolve and adapt to their surroundings much faster. For example, if someone were taking antibiotics, and stopped taking them because the infection they were using them for seemed to be gone, there would most likely still be at least a few of the infectious microbes left in their body, and they could quickly become immune to the antibiotics by starting to multiply again.
Multicellular organisms do not have this advantage, and evolve much slower, though it is also often much harder to kill them. Most cannot multiply fast enough to generate a gene that would make them immune to a poison when their population is dwindling (and if the animal multiplies sexually, it would have yet another disadvantage, as it only takes one unicellular organism to repopulate an ecosystem, since they can do it on their own).
Streptococcus is unicellular, meaning it is made up of a single cell without complex structures or differentiation into specialized cells.
Both unicellular and multicellular organisms can have DNA, cell membrane, cytoplasm, and ribosomes. However, multicellular organisms typically have specialized cells, tissues, and organs that may not be present in unicellular organisms.
No. Absolutely not. Whatever gave you that idea?
NO! They are organelles of cells of both multicellular and unicellular organisms.
Halophiles are multicellular.
Unicellular
multicellular, plants can be both, unicellular and multicellullar
Unicellular is one cell while multicellular is many cells. An example of a unicellular organism is a elephant.
a pond organism is a unicellular
The antonym for unicellular is multicellular. Organisms that are multicellular are made up of multiple cells, while unicellular organisms are made up of a single cell.
Unicellular and multicellular!
They are unicellular and multicellular...
Multicellular, anything you can see has multicells. Cells are very tiny
Prokaryotic cells are typically unicellular, meaning they consist of a single cell.
Streptococcus is unicellular, meaning it is made up of a single cell without complex structures or differentiation into specialized cells.
Both unicellular and multicellular organisms can have DNA, cell membrane, cytoplasm, and ribosomes. However, multicellular organisms typically have specialized cells, tissues, and organs that may not be present in unicellular organisms.
No. Absolutely not. Whatever gave you that idea?