According to stellar classification [See Link] the proportion of Stars in category O,B those massive enough to be categorised as possible candidates for a black hole, number less than 0.13% while candidates for white dwarfs, category G,K, comprise about 20% of all known stars.
{Reinsertion of answerman001 deleted text}
This is because white dwarf stars are caused by the sides of a star pulling inward. However, a black hole is caused when a massive star completely collapses inward upon itself, creating a void of sorts, where instead of giving off light and power, it is blank and gives off nothing(black holes do NOT suck as many people believe). As massive stars are less likely to occur than medium and small- sized stars because of the amount of matter needed to make them, therefore we have many more white dwarf stars than we have black holes.
I have already answered this question but apperantly someone has deleted it so o.k. it is because most stars are medium sized, extremely condensed, or just plain small, while black holes need stars that are super-sized, or have a few medium stars in close proximaty(is someone could just correct those mistakes i would but i need to watch what i put down ty)
More stars have a longer main sequence (low mass stars), which don't swell up to supergiants, they only swell to giants. Low mass stars are more common, and they end up as white dwarfs.
A white dwarf is much larger than a neutron star.
A cooled white dwarf is a black dwarf. I think you are thinking of a neutron star which has nothing to do with a white dwarf.
A neutron star is smaller, but has a greater mass. A typical white dwarf is about the size of a terrestrial planet. A typical neutron star is a few miles across.
No. it is not massive enough. When the sun dies it will become a white dwarf.
There are huge differences in:Size (diameter)DensityColorEnergy production (white dwarves no longer produce energy)Brightness
A white dwarf is much larger than a neutron star.
The Neutron stage follows the White Dwarf stage of star development.
A cooled white dwarf is a black dwarf. I think you are thinking of a neutron star which has nothing to do with a white dwarf.
No, the density of a neutron star is much higher than that of a white dwarf. Neutron stars are composed mostly of densely packed neutrons, while white dwarfs are made of electron-degenerate matter. Neutron stars are some of the densest objects in the universe.
No. A pulsar is a neutron star.
A neutron star is smaller, but has a greater mass. A typical white dwarf is about the size of a terrestrial planet. A typical neutron star is a few miles across.
Its Mass.
No. A pulsar is a neutron star.
Such a white dwarf could not exist. Above 1.4 solar masses a white dwarf will collapse to form a neutron star.
Then, depending on the remaining mass of the star, it will collapse into a white dwarf, a neutron star (aka pulsar), or a black hole.Then, depending on the remaining mass of the star, it will collapse into a white dwarf, a neutron star (aka pulsar), or a black hole.Then, depending on the remaining mass of the star, it will collapse into a white dwarf, a neutron star (aka pulsar), or a black hole.Then, depending on the remaining mass of the star, it will collapse into a white dwarf, a neutron star (aka pulsar), or a black hole.
Being small. Other than that, there are great differences, for example, between a red dwarf, a white dwarf, and a black dwarf, so I suggest you ask more specific questions.
* white dwarf * neutron star * black hole