Labour-intensive production can lead to higher labor costs, especially if wages increase or labor shortages occur. This method is often less efficient than automated processes, resulting in slower production times and lower output. Additionally, reliance on human labor can increase the risk of inconsistencies in product quality and is more susceptible to disruptions from labor strikes or absenteeism. Lastly, it may limit scalability, as expanding operations often requires significant increases in workforce rather than easier investment in technology.
Semi-intensive fish farming can lead to several disadvantages, including potential water quality issues due to nutrient buildup from feed and waste, which can harm fish health and increase disease susceptibility. It often requires significant management and monitoring to balance feed input and fish growth, which can be labor-intensive and costly. Additionally, this farming system may face challenges related to environmental sustainability, such as habitat degradation and conflict with wild fish populations.
intensive
Some disadvantages of budding plants include the risk of the bud failing to take and the possibility of transmitting diseases from the parent plant to the new plant. Additionally, budding can be a more time-consuming and labor-intensive method of propagation compared to other techniques like seed sowing.
Density is an intensive property.
Malleability is an intensive property.
its is labour intensive and takes time and money
Yes, labour is intensive for diamond
Labour intensive work means more jobs available, but it also means that an employer has a higher wage bill, even if wages were relatively poor. An example is that when tractors became common on farms, and could be driven by one man, many farm labours became unemployed. Even traditional crops, such as hops and soft fruit, became less labour intensive as machines took over.
land , capitals , labour intensive
It is extensive. It can be considered whether extensive or intensive by its input of capital, no. of labour, proximity to the market, etc...
Everything was done by hand and was highly labour intensive.
labour intensive means use of manpower in production with little of technology while capital intensive means use of technology in production of a unit of output labour intensive means use of manpower in production with little of technology while capital intensive means use of technology in production of a unit of output
it requires low investment and higher returns.
lack of funds, lack of skilled labour
In general, the 'pros' of Labour-intensive activities are: 1. Flexibility (humans are more flexible and adaptable than machines), and 2. Minimization of up-front capital investment (machines cost a lot). The 'cons' of Labour-intensive activities are: 1. High per-unit production costs under high-volume production 2. Variability in output quality (machines do repetitive task almost exactly the same way every time, and humans do not) 3. Poor scalability (a machine can put out a lot of widgets, humans not so much). There is nothing about "Labour Intensive" activies that is either inherently good or inherently bad. If you live in an economically well-developed country (like the UK in 2009), then unit labor costs are high and therefore a "Labour Intensive" task is likely to be expensive. If you live in a not-so-well-developed country then unit labor costs would be low, and a "Labour Intensive" task will be inexpensive. For example, if you look at high-quality buildings in London that were built prior to the year 1900, you will see that there are many beautiful architectural details such as hand-crafted trim and moldings. Labour was cheap, so Labour-intensive jobs were plentiful. If you look at buildings after the year 2000, you will see few labour-intensive details because they are too expensive.
One of the main features of mass production is the firm being highly mechanized (capital intensive), rather than the use of manual labour (labour intensive). Specialization is also another feature of mas production. make it easier to understand
it results into regional division of labour