answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Natural Sciences
Related Questions

Why are encyclopedias a poor source of primary information?

They are unreliable.


Did Christian Bale die?

He is not dead. Wherever you heard that is an unreliable source of information


Why might you be likely to feel that an Internet source is unreliable?

When the information is posted without a specific source, the validity of the information cannot be determined or evaluated.


How do you tell the difference between a reliable source and an unreliable source?

Only experience can tell you that. A source whose information checks out when compared to reality (e.g. other sources) is usually reliable, while a source whose data turns out not to match reality would be considered unreliable.


What are some unreliable source?

Wikipedia can sometimes mislead readers because anybody can put information on that website.


When would a secondary source be considered unreliable?

A secondary source may be considered unreliable if it is based on incomplete or biased information, lacks credibility or expertise, or has not been properly fact-checked or verified. It is essential to critically evaluate the source's authoritativeness and accuracy before using it for academic or research purposes.


What is reliable information?

Information that you can trust would be termed reliable. If you aren't sure of the source, or the source is someone that you don't trust, then the information would be unreliable, and you wouldn't count on it in an important situation. If the information is reliable, then you might trust it without doing your own research.


Why do historians find Livy an unreliable source of information?

Because the books she wrote had a lot of errors and was a straight forward lie as well.


When is a source considered to be weak?

A source is considered weak when it lacks credibility, is biased, contains unreliable information, and does not provide support for its claims. It may also lack expertise, use outdated information, or lack proper citations.


When a source for evidence is not convincing or reliable it is to be considered what?

When a source for evidence is not convincing or reliable, it should be considered unreliable or questionable. It is important to verify information from credible sources to ensure accuracy and authenticity.


Why is Reddit not considered a reliable source for information?

Reddit is not considered a reliable source for information because it is a user-generated platform where anyone can post content without fact-checking or verification. This can lead to misinformation, biased opinions, and unreliable information being spread easily.


Is a blog a reliable source?

No. Blogs contain opinions and ranting. They are unreliable.