Any cells can be used as you will find DNA in almost all of them (a few exceptions are red blood cells, platelets, etc.) but even where one specific cell in a tissue has no DNA many adjacent cells in the sample will have DNA.
It is estimated that there are around 10^30 living cells on Earth, with the majority being microbial. Nonliving cells, such as those found in rocks and minerals, do not have a well-defined count but are significantly fewer in number compared to living cells.
A mutation in a person's skin cells would be least likely to impact their ability to produce insulin as insulin is primarily produced by pancreatic cells. Skin cells are not directly involved in insulin production or regulation.
Yes, all living cells contain amino acids, which are the building blocks of proteins. Proteins are essential for various biological processes, such as enzyme catalysis, structural support, and cell signaling. Therefore, a test for amino acids would likely be positive in all living cells.
Because you can get more information using living cells cause there the real thing. Using dead cells wouldn't work cause the cell is dead and it doesnt have the same things it had when it was alive. It is generally considered better to look at living cells than dead cells for two reasons. Firstly, when a cell is living, you can observe the cellular processes as they happen. Secondly, over time, parts of dead cells deteriorate, akin to a fruit rotting.
it would cause cancer to develop
every living thing has cells so a catfish would have cells
Life wouldn't be without cells. Cells are living and make up living organisms.
Life wouldn't be without cells. Cells are living and make up living organisms.
It is estimated that there are around 10^30 living cells on Earth, with the majority being microbial. Nonliving cells, such as those found in rocks and minerals, do not have a well-defined count but are significantly fewer in number compared to living cells.
No one 'created' the cell, as all living things have cells, and a creator of the cell would have to not have cells in order to create them. The person who discovered the cell is named Robert Hooke.
Yes all living things do posses cells because cells are what keep us alive. Without cells there would be no life on planet earth.
A person living underwater would die. But, people do float.
i think it would be people animals etc anything that is living with lots of cells
A cell is a single living unit that works together with other cells to be a living being. Humans have skin cells, liver cells, brain cells, etc. Plants would have stem and leaf cells. Fetuses have a lot of stem cells.
The person living in Denver (5280 feet elevation) would likely have higher hemoglobin levels compared to the person living in Philadelphia (39 feet elevation). This is because at higher elevations, the air has lower oxygen concentration, prompting the body to produce more red blood cells and hemoglobin to compensate for the lower oxygen availability.
Why would you bury a LIVING person? lol
This person would be multicellular.