0
What else can I help you with?
Is there really evidence that there was a planet on the asteroid belt?
There certainly is enough material in the asteroid belt to form another planet, however the immense gravity of Jupiter prevented a planet from forming.
Why do the scientist think that the asteroid belt did not form a planet?
Jupiter's massive gravitational force, (along with Mars lesser gravitional force) prevented the asteroid belt from forming into a planet. Either that or it was a small planet (like Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars) that was smashed to bits after a collision with a very large object and the bits eventually formed into the asteroid belt.
Scientist theorize that the asteroid belt did not form a planet because of what?
Scientists theorize that the asteroid belt did not form a planet due to the gravitational influence of Jupiter disrupting planet formation. Jupiter's strong gravity prevented the material in the asteroid belt from accreting into a planet.
Why did the asteroid belt never accrete into a planetary body?
The gravitational forces of Jupiter prevented the material in the asteroid belt from coalescing into a planet by disrupting their orbits and scattering them. Additionally, the asteroids are in a region where the combined gravity of Jupiter and the Sun prevented them from forming a planet.
Why were the asteroids that form a belt between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter prevented from forming a planet?
Gravitational forces from Jupiter's powerful gravity disrupted the process of planet formation in the asteroid belt. These forces prevented the asteroids from coalescing into a single planet, instead keeping them in their current dispersed state.
Is there really evidence that there was a planet on the asteroid belt?
There certainly is enough material in the asteroid belt to form another planet, however the immense gravity of Jupiter prevented a planet from forming.
Why do the scientist think that the asteroid belt did not form a planet?
Jupiter's massive gravitational force, (along with Mars lesser gravitional force) prevented the asteroid belt from forming into a planet. Either that or it was a small planet (like Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars) that was smashed to bits after a collision with a very large object and the bits eventually formed into the asteroid belt.
Scientists theorize that the asteroid belt did not form a planet because?
the gravitational forces from Jupiter's powerful gravity disrupted the process of planet formation in the asteroid belt region. This prevented the mass of material in the asteroid belt from coalescing into a planet. Additionally, the gravitational interactions between Jupiter and the material in the asteroid belt prevented a single planet from forming.
Scientist theorize that the asteroid belt did not form a planet because of what?
Scientists theorize that the asteroid belt did not form a planet due to the gravitational influence of Jupiter disrupting planet formation. Jupiter's strong gravity prevented the material in the asteroid belt from accreting into a planet.
Why do scientists refer to it as an asteroid belt and not a planet?
Currently the combined mass of all the asteroids in the asteroid belt is much less than that of any planet, though there were probably many more asteroids in the belt when the solar system was young. One of the leading hypotheses is that gravitational disturbances from Jupiter prevented a planet from forming where the asteroid belt is.
What planet kept a planet from forming and as a result you have the asteroid belt?
Jupiter
Why did the asteroid belt never accrete into a planetary body?
The gravitational forces of Jupiter prevented the material in the asteroid belt from coalescing into a planet by disrupting their orbits and scattering them. Additionally, the asteroids are in a region where the combined gravity of Jupiter and the Sun prevented them from forming a planet.
Why were the asteroids that form a belt between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter prevented from forming a planet?
Gravitational forces from Jupiter's powerful gravity disrupted the process of planet formation in the asteroid belt. These forces prevented the asteroids from coalescing into a single planet, instead keeping them in their current dispersed state.
What might the asteroid belt have previously been?
Some have speculated that it was an actual planet that broke up, but the mass would be lower than expected for a planet. The more likely reason is that massive Jupiter prevented a planet from forming there in the first place, siphoning off most of the lighter elements as the planets were forming.
What is thought to be the remains of a planet that broke apart?
At one time, the asteroid belt was thought to be the remnants of a planet that broke apart.However, this is no longer thought to be true; it's much more likely that gravitational perturbations from Jupiter prevented a planet from ever forming there in the first place.
How did Saturn get rings for kids?
Scientist think that Saturn got its rings by an asteroid getting to close to the planet and the gases on the planet fused with the asteroid and caused the dusty looking rings around that planet.
Why scientists theorize that the asteroid belt did not form a planet?
scientists theorize that it was jupiters gravity that kept it from forming
