Obviously, the same way they reacted when unambiguous evidence was presented that the Steady State Universe was not true, that neutrinoes had mass, that luminous matter was less than 25% of the mass in our Universe, and that the rate of expansion of our Universe was increasing. In all cases, the beliefs of the majority of scientists were shown to be false, and these false ideas were replaced by ideas that had the support of clear observational evidence.
At one point, evidence existed that white dwarf stars were older than 15 billion years old; which would place them older than the Universe. Better evidence of their age showed that they were instead about 12 billion years old.
Science doesn't suppress evidence contrary to accepted ideas. Indeed, it celebrates such contradictory ideas, hoping for a resolution.
Shame that you called it the Big Bag Theory...which made me smile ....but as it is just a theory, that few understand, I would say that whatever is
said proved or otherwise, would be difficult....It is something you either believe or don't...no one will ever really ever know. Easier to understand than the answer above, i think
It supports the theory because it can be found on all of the continents.
Scientists found evidence of magnetic stripes on the ocean floor, which indicated periodic reversals in Earth's magnetic field. This discovery helped support the theory of plate tectonics and seafloor spreading.
Scientist rejected Wegners hypothesis of continental drift at first because he did not have enogh evidence to support his theory. He failed to provide a suitable mechanism that could cause the continents to move.
The cell theory is supported by the fact that the cell membrane, cytoplasm, and genetic material can be found in all types of cells.
The fossil that was found on different continents and used to support the theory of continental drift is the Mesosaurus. This extinct freshwater reptile had limited swimming abilities, making it unlikely that it could have crossed vast oceans. Its distribution on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean provided evidence of land connections that later formed the basis for the theory of continental drift.
Discard it all.
The scientists with the assistance of the microscopes that were invented in the 16th century AD/ CE found out the microbes or microorganisms And the existence of cells, and cell theory, for one....
It supports the theory because it can be found on all of the continents.
Scientists found evidence of magnetic stripes on the ocean floor, which indicated periodic reversals in Earth's magnetic field. This discovery helped support the theory of plate tectonics and seafloor spreading.
sikhs do believe in the big bang theory. it was written in the guru granth sahib ji before scientists found out.
Scientist rejected Wegners hypothesis of continental drift at first because he did not have enogh evidence to support his theory. He failed to provide a suitable mechanism that could cause the continents to move.
Scientists support the idea of a supercontinent called Pangaea through evidence such as matching coastlines, similar rock formations, and identical fossils found on different continents. Additionally, the movement of tectonic plates, as recorded by magnetic anomalies in the ocean floor, provides further support for the theory of continental drift.
he found fossles
mesosaurus
The cell theory is supported by the fact that the cell membrane, cytoplasm, and genetic material can be found in all types of cells.
This is because there is more evidence to suggest one theory took place over another. More evidence means a larger likelyhood. But likelyhood alone cannot conclusively present an answer, therefore even though some theories are more PROBABLE, they are only as POSSIBLE as any other theory which has evidence to support it.
There is no credible evidence to support the theory that Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 had bullet holes in its fuselage. The official investigation has not found any proof of this claim.