Prokaryotes are much simpler organisms than eukaryotes. It is thought that eukaryotes evolved from prokaryotes. In both cases the evolution process was lengthy and similar to the evolution of other organisms.
No. Evolution explains how and why organisms change over time. It makes no difference to evolution how organisms are generated.
Current theories that conflict with Darwin's theory of evolution include Lamarckism, which suggests acquired traits can be passed down through generations, and Saltationism, which proposes that large evolutionary changes can happen suddenly. Supporters of Lamarckism cite cases of epigenetics as evidence, while proponents of Saltationism point to instances of punctuated equilibrium in the fossil record to support their claims.
in the neighborhood of 14.5 billion years, from current evidence
The single-celled organism at the base of the tree of life, often referred to as the last universal common ancestor (LUCA), is estimated to have existed around 3.5 to 4 billion years ago. This ancient organism is thought to be a simple prokaryote, from which all current life forms, including bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes, eventually descended. Its age reflects the early stages of life's evolution on Earth.
An understanding of genetics, particularly the work of Gregor Mendel on inheritance patterns, provided crucial evidence for natural selection as the driving force of evolution. This, combined with knowledge of genetic variation and mutations, helped reconcile genetics with the theory of evolution in the modern synthesis, demonstrating how genetic changes accumulate over time to drive evolutionary change.
Evolution states that species share common ancestry, going back to just one or a select few original forms. Current models suggest prokaryotes, eukaryotes and archaea may have distinct origins, but all eukaryotes, for example, would have evolved from some original eukaryotic organism. This says nothing about land and water. Geology indicates ocean covered much of earth's surface from very early on.
It is often believed that species evolve to become better and become an ultimate organism.This is a misconception. Evolution becomes parallel and takes place simultaneously in different species. Evolution may also be continuous mutation. Evolution takes place simply to ensure better survival in the current habitat.
Vestigial structures are remnants of features that were functional in the ancestors of a given species but are no longer useful in the current species. This supports the idea of evolution as it suggests that species have evolved over time from ancestors with different anatomical features. The presence of vestigial structures provides evidence of common ancestry and the gradual changes that have occurred over time through the process of evolution.
Examples of structural evidence of evolution include homologous structures, which are similar in form and function but have different evolutionary origins, and vestigial structures, which are remnants of once-functional features that have no purpose in the current species. Another example is the fossil record, which shows transitional forms that demonstrate gradual changes in species over time.
I am uncertain of what the current pope specifically "believes" regarding the current Theory of Evolution, but what I can say is that the Theory of Evolution poses no challenge to the Catholic Faith. I can say that the current pope, whatever he personally believes regarding the Theory of Evolution would say that the current theory of evolution poses no challenge to the Catholic Faith. Because the Theory of Evolution is a Scientific Claim, and not a theological claim, the Church cannot make a judgment as to the truth or falsity of the Theory. Matters pertaining to Science are outside the purview of the judgment of the Church, because the Church was not established to discover Scientific Truth.
The deflection of a magnetic compass in the presence of an electric current, is evidence that an electric current produces a magnetic field.
No. Evolution explains how and why organisms change over time. It makes no difference to evolution how organisms are generated.
Main Sequence
The modern theory of evolution combines Darwin's theory of natural selection with our current understanding of genetics to explain how species change over time. It emphasizes that genetic variation, inheritance, and environmental pressures drive the process of evolution. This theory is supported by evidence from fields such as genetics, paleontology, and biogeography.
Current theories that conflict with Darwin's theory of evolution include Lamarckism, which suggests acquired traits can be passed down through generations, and Saltationism, which proposes that large evolutionary changes can happen suddenly. Supporters of Lamarckism cite cases of epigenetics as evidence, while proponents of Saltationism point to instances of punctuated equilibrium in the fossil record to support their claims.
It is called impossible, according to current theory.
I know of no star by that name.