Without knowing the strategy to which you're referring it would be difficult to answer this question.
The lack of contingency planning for unexpected events proved to be a weakness in this strategy. It left the team unprepared to adapt to changes in the market or unforeseen challenges, limiting the strategy's effectiveness.
Balboa
The law of conservation of mass is proved through chemical equations by ensuring that the total mass of reactants is equal to the total mass of products. This is done by balancing the number of atoms of each element on both sides of the equation. If the equation is balanced, it demonstrates that mass is conserved in the reaction.
Today we know that atoms can be destroyed to nuclear reactions but not by chemical reactions.
It proved that Isaac newton's Theories Of Motion And Gravity are correct.
The lack of contingency planning for unexpected events proved to be a weakness in this strategy. It left the team unprepared to adapt to changes in the market or unforeseen challenges, limiting the strategy's effectiveness.
Blitzkrieg .
Its proved on periodic table and because of the way that they react together.
The Battle of Marathon proved that Greek armor , tactics and strategy could defeat a numerically superior opponent .
It has been used to depict a message or a feeling
However, this strategy has proved to be largely ineffective in dealing with organizational change processes, particularly for successful integration.
Germany immediately broke agreements to give up expansion in exchange for land
its Lightning Type..Kakashi and Sasuke proved that lightning is for quickness..by using their "Chidori"...
You think probable to Leucippus; but this affirmation was only a philosopher intuition, not experimentally proved.
During a war against the British, Napoleon Bonaparte had to replace his injured captain. He proved himself by attacking the port and scaring of the British. His strategy got him promotions and got him notice which led to the ruling of Europe.
Coal and oil were two fossil fuels that proved essential to fuel the British Industrial Revolution.
This is a guess; I'm not a lawyer but used to be a court reporter and come from a family of lawyers. Having said that: intent. There would be no need to prove that any harm was intended by the negligent person or entity.