Fossil evidence from late Devonian rocks show that some groups of marine organisms experienced significant extinction events, which may suggest a period of environmental upheaval. Sedimentary records also indicate abrupt changes in sea levels and climate during this time. The presence of specific isotopic markers in the rock record can further support the theory of overturning during the late Devonian.
The fact that the cma cell has no nucleus implies that it is a eukaryote.
Saying a scientific question must be supportable means it must be answerable through evidence-based methods and data. It implies that the question should be structured in a way that allows for investigation and testing to reach a valid conclusion.
Purefactive is a linguistic term used to describe verbs that only express an action that is completed or realized, leaving no room for uncertainty or doubt. It implies that the action described by the verb has definitely occurred. An example of a purefactive verb is "realize" in the sentence "She realized her mistake."
Distilled implies boiling, Reverse osmosis implies the use of semi-permeable membranes. I say "implies" because there's a lot of cheating in the bottled water industry.
A hypothesis is a good acurate guess based on the facts and evidence, while a theory is just a wild guess. But a hypothesis and theory's are both made by scientists with more knowledge than a regular, ordinary person.
In court, different types of evidence that can be presented include physical evidence (such as documents, objects, or DNA), testimonial evidence (statements made by witnesses or experts), and circumstantial evidence (indirect evidence that implies a fact).
Yes, they can, if new evidence is discovered to support a change in the theory. Physical theories are not provable in the sense of mathematical theorems. They depend on evidence, and they can be disproved if enough contrary evidence comes up.
Circumstantial evidence is evidence that implies a fact but does not directly prove it. It requires inference or deduction to connect it to a conclusion. In contrast, direct evidence directly proves a fact without the need for inference.
Circumstantial evidence is indirect evidence that implies a fact but does not directly prove it, while physical evidence is tangible evidence that can be directly observed or measured. In a criminal investigation, physical evidence is typically more reliable and persuasive than circumstantial evidence because it provides concrete proof of a fact.
The fact that the cma cell has no nucleus implies that it is a eukaryote.
Sources of circumstantial evidence can include witness testimony, physical evidence such as fingerprints or DNA, behavior of the accused before or after the incident, and any other indirect evidence that implies a connection to the crime. Circumstantial evidence is not based on direct observation but on inference, making it important to consider in the context of the overall case.
"Quotient" implies that there is some sort of division going on. I don't see any evidence of that.
The phrase "it is written" implies that something that has occurred in your life was meant to happen just as it did. It also implies that there is a "writer" of the events of our lives. A creator of the events of our lives, who allows paths to cross and events to happen. How we respond to these events, people and places determines how we fulfill our destinies or how we do not.
Indirect evidence should be used when you don't have direct or conclusive proof of a particular fact or conclusion but have supporting information that implies it. It can help build a stronger case or argument when direct evidence is lacking or ambiguous. Indirect evidence can be particularly useful in investigations, historical research, and scientific inquiries.
This phrase implies that there was no evidence or trace left behind of someone's actions or presence, particularly when they were attempting to be secretive or covering their tracks. It can be used metaphorically to suggest that someone has been very thorough in avoiding detection or leaving evidence.
Being exonerated means that a person has been cleared of a criminal conviction. It typically implies that new evidence has shown the individual's innocence and their guilty verdict is overturned.
Implies can be like indicates when talking about something. "The way she talks about him implies that he is sailor" John said.