0
What evidence is there to support the idea that opposite polar ends of molecules attract each other?
The evidence supporting the attraction between opposite polar ends of molecules primarily comes from the principles of dipole-dipole interactions and hydrogen bonding. Molecules with polar covalent bonds possess regions of partial positive and negative charges, leading to an electrostatic attraction between the positive end of one molecule and the negative end of another. Experimental observations, such as the behavior of polar solvents like water dissolving ionic compounds, further illustrate this attraction. Additionally, techniques like spectroscopy provide insights into these interactions at the molecular level.
What else can I help you with?
What evidence support your claim?
Fjh
Did the addition of molecular evidence support or refute the hypothesis that you made earlier based on structural evidence only?
The addition of molecular evidence supported the hypothesis made earlier based on structural evidence. Molecular evidence provides additional data that can confirm or strengthen hypotheses that are based on structural evidence.
Who did not have experimental evidence to support his of the atom?
Democritus did not have experimental evidence to support his idea of the atom. Instead, his idea was based on philosophical reasoning and speculation.
Is the number of stars in the Milky Way Galaxy evidence in support of Big Bang Cosmology?
no the no. of stars in the milky way is not the evidence in support of the big bang cosmology.
What is the basic structure of an argument?
An argument typically consists of a claim, evidence to support that claim, and reasoning that explains how the evidence supports the claim. The claim is the main point being made, the evidence provides support or proof for the claim, and the reasoning connects the evidence to the claim.
Do bananas attract misquitos?
No, there is no evidence to support the myth that bananas attract mosquitoes.
What is the opposite of a science solution?
The opposite of a scientific solution would be an unscientific or pseudoscientific solution. This refers to methods or explanations that lack empirical evidence, scientific support, or do not adhere to the principles of the scientific method.
What does corroborate mean?
Corroborate means to strengthen or support with evidence.
In what kind of proof do you assume the opposite of what you want to prove?
This is a "proof by contradiction", where the evidence would fail to support the reverse assumption, giving credence to the original hypothesis.
What is the opposite of support?
The opposite of support (hold up) is to undermine, destroy, or collapse. The opposite of support (help) is to neglect, oppose, or condemn.
What question should a writer ask when choosing evidence to support a claim?
Is the evidence from the best source I can find
What is the opposite of from?
An opposite of the word "to" is from.
Opposite of complain?
The opposite of complain are accept, support, approve
What is the opposite of dispute?
The opposite of dispute is agreement or consensus.
What is opposite of against?
The opposite would be for, in favor of, in support of, or advocating.
What evidence was used to support the oparin haldane hypothesis?
The Oparin-Haldane hypothesis was supported by experimental evidence showing that complex organic molecules, including amino acids, could be formed from simpler molecules in a reducing atmosphere similar to that believed to exist on early Earth. This was demonstrated through laboratory experiments simulating the conditions of the primitive Earth. Additionally, the presence of organic molecules in meteorites provided further support for the idea that the building blocks of life could have originated from non-biological processes.
How did wegemer use as evidence based on fossils to support his theory that the continents had moved?
Wegener used the similarity of plant and animal fossils found on opposite sides of the Atlantic Ocean as evidence to support his theory of continental drift. He argued that these identical fossils could only have been separated by the movement of continents over time.
