CO2
Generally, plants do not grow well in green light as the green portion of white light is reflected (this is why plants appear green), if a plant was subject to only green light it wouldn't take in as much light energy because it would be reflected, therefore, photosynthesis would not be carried out as efficiently as a plant subjected to white light.
White light would be universal, but if you had to choose a color, and the color of the plant is green, then green light would not help it photosynthesize the easiest, because green light is reflected from these plants. Just like red light would be reflected from red plants, it probably wouldn't be the best to use
Not well. The spectrum of light as well as the duration of day/night cycles trigger development and reproduction in plants.
No, water plants require light for photosynthesis, a process that allows them to produce food. Without light, water plants would not be able to convert carbon dioxide into oxygen and essential nutrients. This would eventually lead to the plants dying due to lack of energy.
why does plants color change to black when absorbed all wavelengths
Plants need light to make food, we need light to see, and without plants animals wouldn't eat, without animals and plants we would die.
If there were no Sun, and no other source of radiant energy, the plants (and the entire planet) would quickly freeze. And since the color of an object is determined by the color of the light that is reflected by the object, with no light there would be no color, and everything would be black. If we grow plants under artificial light on a space station, then the light on the space station (even if artificial) would be the same kinds of light that we humans prefer, so the plants on the space station would continue to be green.
Generally, plants do not grow well in green light as the green portion of white light is reflected (this is why plants appear green), if a plant was subject to only green light it wouldn't take in as much light energy because it would be reflected, therefore, photosynthesis would not be carried out as efficiently as a plant subjected to white light.
A photometer would measure the intensity of light, and a spectrometer would determine which frequencies are present.
If plants did not disperse, they would all be stuck in a single location. They would then compete for soil and light and would eventually die out.
White light would be universal, but if you had to choose a color, and the color of the plant is green, then green light would not help it photosynthesize the easiest, because green light is reflected from these plants. Just like red light would be reflected from red plants, it probably wouldn't be the best to use
Plants require light for photosynthesis, a process crucial for their growth and survival.
Plants need to grow towards the light because without light, they would not get the energy they need to survive. If plants were not in light, they would shrivel from starvation, and finally die. Daniel H. Goldstein 11 years old Sixth grade Found answer while studying for science fair
Of course the plants are needing it.Because without sunlight they would die.
Not well. The spectrum of light as well as the duration of day/night cycles trigger development and reproduction in plants.
No, water plants require light for photosynthesis, a process that allows them to produce food. Without light, water plants would not be able to convert carbon dioxide into oxygen and essential nutrients. This would eventually lead to the plants dying due to lack of energy.
If one of the elements of photosynthesis, such as light, water, carbon dioxide, or chlorophyll, was not present, plants would not be able to carry out photosynthesis effectively. This would lead to a decrease in the production of glucose and oxygen, which are essential for the plant's growth and survival. Over time, the plant would weaken and eventually die.