If you have an old TV (the kind that you must turn channels with a knob) you may notice that, in between the channels, there was a fair amount of static in between them. Some of this was cosmic microwave background radiation- CMB. The same amount of CMB was present no matter where we looked, thus adding on to the proof of the Big Bang Theory.
No, electrons in TV static are generated by the machinery involved in producing the static, while the electrons present after the Big Bang are fundamental particles that make up matter and were created in the early universe. The two are not related in terms of origin or significance.
According to the believes of physics and the big bang, we know that the big bang was both big and a bang. Since we are still receiving radiation from the big bang, So considering that factor I would say that it was big and a bang. What do you believe?
There are two questions commonly asked:1. Is it real, or did God create the universe ex nihilo?2. Did the Big Bang create more than one universe?3. How can the big bang account for dark matter and dark energy?
Big Bang theorist believe
He didn't. Although Hawking has done an immense amount of theoretical work on black holes, as well as the topology of our Universe, he has always taken Big Bang Cosmology as his starting point. That's because, by the time he got his PhD in 1966, observational evidence had pretty much ruled out any cosmology but Big Bang. Hawking has simply improved our mathematical understanding of BBC.
the weakness is that you can still see the big bang, when there is a static on the tele that is the big bang particles still there...im not kidding!!!
Virgil was caught up in a gang war then in an explosion of gas called the big bang he got his powers
Before the Big Bang theory, many scientists believed that the universe was static, or infinitely unchanging.
supposedly energy from 'The Big Bang'
No, electrons in TV static are generated by the machinery involved in producing the static, while the electrons present after the Big Bang are fundamental particles that make up matter and were created in the early universe. The two are not related in terms of origin or significance.
Before LeMaitre first proposed his Big Bang thesis, many scientists believed that the universe was static - whether or not they believed it was eternal. Even after the Big Bang model gained support and was confirmed through the evidence, Einstein had some trouble accepting it, favouring a static model as he did.
Look up the big bang, its about how the universe was created- but the big bang is the same way stars got, and are still getting created.
The big bang was when god got horny and decided to *%&$ mrs. god. he forgot to use a condom and thus the universe was born
According to the believes of physics and the big bang, we know that the big bang was both big and a bang. Since we are still receiving radiation from the big bang, So considering that factor I would say that it was big and a bang. What do you believe?
Big Bang - Big Bang album - was created on 2009-08-19.
Alienware mx17
The Theory of Relativity was created by Einstein, not by Eisenstein. Comment: The most obvious thing is that Einstein's equations predicted that the Universe was not "static". So a "Big Bang", expanding Universe fits the theory.