answersLogoWhite

0

atoms cannot be divided

User Avatar

Vincent Hilpert

Lvl 13
3y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

When was the atom changed when new evidence was discovered?

atoms cannot be divided


What changed about the atom when new evidence was discovered?

atoms cannot be divided


What idea about the atom change when new evidence was discovered?

atoms cannot be divided


What ideas about atoms changed when new evidence was discovered?

atoms cannot be divided


Is it true or false the Scientists accept ideas from the past but will revise them when new evidence is discovered?

true


What ideas about the atom changed when new evidence is discovered?

New evidence has led to the understanding that atoms are not indivisible, as previously thought, but are composed of subatomic particles like protons, neutrons, and electrons. Additionally, the discovery of isotopes showed that atoms of the same element can have different numbers of neutrons, leading to a more complex understanding of atomic structure.


What is a set of ideas supported by evidence?

A theory is a set of ideas supported by evidence. It is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experimentation. Theories can evolve and change as new evidence is discovered.


To what extent have you discovered evidence of a rebirth or a new age?

There is no scientific evidence to support the concept of rebirth or a new age as these ideas are primarily philosophical or spiritual beliefs. These concepts are subjective and vary across different belief systems and cultures.


When do biological classification scheme change?

as new evidence and more kinds of organism are discovered


Which of these best describes the basis on which new scientific ideas are accepted or rejected?

New scientific ideas are typically accepted or rejected based on the evidence supporting them. Ideas that are consistent with experimental data and can be replicated by other researchers are more likely to be accepted. Conversely, ideas that lack evidence or are inconsistent with established scientific principles are more likely to be rejected.


Why have scientists revised the a atomic model many times?

they could discover a new atom and it would change


How should scientists respond when new evidence that challenges current ideas is presented?

Evaluate said evidence and accept it if it is valid. Unfortunately, scientists are all too human and some hold on to ideas that are no longer supported by the evidence, especially if the idea is theirs. That is why consensus and peer review is important in science.