atoms cannot be divided
atoms cannot be divided
atoms cannot be divided
they could discover a new atom and it would change
New scientific ideas are typically accepted or rejected based on evidence, experimental results, and how well they align with existing theories and principles. Ideas that can be tested, replicated, and provide new insights into the natural world are more likely to be accepted. Peer review by other experts in the field also plays a crucial role in evaluating the validity and significance of new scientific ideas.
Scientists are not resistant to change, they are always ready to look at new evidence for scientific theories. But science develops by looking at new ideas and rejecting the ones that can be proved wrong, so this is why scientists always have to look at new ideas when they come along and try to disprove them. The scientific theories that last are the ones that could never be disproved.
atoms cannot be divided
atoms cannot be divided
atoms cannot be divided
atoms cannot be divided
true
New evidence has led to the understanding that atoms are not indivisible, as previously thought, but are composed of subatomic particles like protons, neutrons, and electrons. Additionally, the discovery of isotopes showed that atoms of the same element can have different numbers of neutrons, leading to a more complex understanding of atomic structure.
A theory is a set of ideas supported by evidence. It is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experimentation. Theories can evolve and change as new evidence is discovered.
There is no scientific evidence to support the concept of rebirth or a new age as these ideas are primarily philosophical or spiritual beliefs. These concepts are subjective and vary across different belief systems and cultures.
as new evidence and more kinds of organism are discovered
New scientific ideas are typically accepted or rejected based on the evidence supporting them. Ideas that are consistent with experimental data and can be replicated by other researchers are more likely to be accepted. Conversely, ideas that lack evidence or are inconsistent with established scientific principles are more likely to be rejected.
they could discover a new atom and it would change
Evaluate said evidence and accept it if it is valid. Unfortunately, scientists are all too human and some hold on to ideas that are no longer supported by the evidence, especially if the idea is theirs. That is why consensus and peer review is important in science.