There is no reason to believe that there are any black holes - stellar or otherwise - within our Solar System.
A black hole would take millions to billions of years to consume a solar system, depending on its mass and the distance of the solar system from the black hole. The process would involve gravitational interactions that could disrupt planetary orbits and potentially eject them from the system.
They will be drawn into a larger cloud by gravitational attraction and eventually, this can form a stellar system.
Nuclear fusion affects stellar evolution by essentially halting all mitosis and miosis that any cells in a stellar evolution could experience, and they stunt the growth of the object.
"Less than stellar" is a phrase used to describe something that is not very good or impressive, below expectations, or mediocre in quality. It suggests that the performance or outcome could have been better.
In a solar system where the central star lacked a strong stellar wind, the planets would be more exposed to cosmic radiation and solar flares, potentially affecting their atmospheres and habitability. Without the stellar wind's pressure, dust and gas could accumulate more readily in the system, leading to a different dynamic in planetary formation and evolution. Additionally, the absence of a strong wind might allow for a more stable orbital environment, potentially enabling the development of complex ecosystems on any habitable planets.
A black hole? well scientist are not sure. Black holes is a theory, not proving to be true. But there could be.
Yes a black hole could envelope our solar system but it does not swallow anything.
A black hole would take millions to billions of years to consume a solar system, depending on its mass and the distance of the solar system from the black hole. The process would involve gravitational interactions that could disrupt planetary orbits and potentially eject them from the system.
It could be anything. * Stellar remnants * Neutron star * Standard candles * Symbiotic variable star * Black hole * Nebula
The original of our solar system could be locked within a comet.
They will be drawn into a larger cloud by gravitational attraction and eventually, this can form a stellar system.
Supernovae, including hypernovae, are expected to form stellar black holes. The stars that eventually become supernovae (or hypernovae) don't have the mass requird for an intermediate-mass black hole. It is not yet entirely clear how intermediate-mass black holes or supermassive black holes form; perhaps they start as a stellar-mass black hole and gather more mass, or perhaps a larger object, such as a gas cloud, somehow collapses directly into a gigantic black hole.
The stellar jays adaptation is the stellar jays egg changes color in different seasons and the season it hatches say winter for example it could adapt to snowy places.
Nuclear fusion affects stellar evolution by essentially halting all mitosis and miosis that any cells in a stellar evolution could experience, and they stunt the growth of the object.
Heavens no! It will depend on your definition of scientist of course but a claim could be made for Homo Habilus who invented stone tools some 20,000 years ago.
Someone can find the definition of the Autonomic Nervous System in libraries. They could also ask a scientist for the definition, they could help you figure out everything you need to know about the Autonomic Nervous System.
A beekeeper could be a scientist, but not necessarily.