You did an experiment or study for your science class, and now you have to write it up for your teacher to review. You feel that you understood the background sufficiently, designed and completed the study effectively, obtained useful data, and can use those data to draw conclusions about a scientific process or principle. But how exactly do you write all that? What is your teacher expecting to see?
To take some of the guesswork out of answering these questions, try to think beyond the classroom setting. In fact, you and your teacher are both part of a scientific community, and the people who participate in this community tend to share the same values. As long as you understand and respect these values, your writing will likely meet the expectations of your audience-including your teacher.
So why are you writing this research report? The practical answer is "Because the teacher assigned it," but that's classroom thinking. Generally speaking, people investigating some scientific hypothesis have a responsibility to the rest of the scientific world to report their findings, particularly if these findings add to or contradict previous ideas. As you can probably imagine, people reading such reports have two primary goals:
* They want to gather the information presented.
* They want to know that the findings are legitimate.
Your job as a writer, then, is to fulfill these two goals.
How do I do that?
Good question. You're probably familiar with the basic format scientists have designed for research reports:
* Introduction
* Methods and Materials
* Results
* Discussion
This format, sometimes called "IMRAD," may take slightly different shapes depending on the discipline or audience; some ask you to include an abstract or separate section for the hypothesis, or call the Discussion section "Conclusions," or change the order of the sections (some professional and academic journals require the Methods section to appear last). Overall, however, the IMRAD format was devised to represent a textual version of the scientific method.
For the source and more detailed information concerning this subject, click on the related links section indicated below.
Report her results in a scientific journal. study island sucks.
By publishing them. Sometimes in a report, sometimes (or simultaneously) in an article, preferably in one of the major scientific journals like Nature or The Lancet.
Scientists can report their results through scientific papers published in peer-reviewed journals, providing detailed descriptions of their methods, findings, and conclusions. They can also present their results at scientific conferences through oral presentations or poster sessions to share their findings with the broader scientific community.
In a scientific report, it is common to use the past tense when describing experimental procedures and reporting results. The present tense is used to state facts and to discuss the implications of the findings. The passive voice is often preferred to maintain objectivity.
Scientists should report their results once they have completed their research, analyzed the data, and drawn conclusions. It is important to share their findings in a timely manner to contribute to the scientific community's knowledge and transparency.
5.68021248 * 10^8
The aim and the purpose.
analyze and report findings (novanet)
doing a science Report on Kidney Disease need to know the scientific name
to study the pyhsical world to answer scientific questions accurately
Publishing the results. Analyze and report findings.
Publishing the results. Analyze and report findings.
Law! Thats what it is because i did a science report on scientific law!:)
well I DONT KNOW MAN.
Report her results in a scientific journal. study island sucks.
precison.
By publishing them. Sometimes in a report, sometimes (or simultaneously) in an article, preferably in one of the major scientific journals like Nature or The Lancet.