answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Natural Sciences

How does a hypothesis help scientists understand natural world?

A hypothesis provides a testable explanation for a scientific phenomenon or observation. It helps scientists make predictions and design experiments to gather data that either supports or refutes the hypothesis, leading to a deeper understanding of the natural world. By systematically testing hypotheses, scientists can refine their understanding of how the world works through the process of scientific inquiry.


Is the word explanation an abstract noun?

Yes, the noun 'explanation' is an abstract noun; a word for a clarification of a misunderstanding; a description of how something works or of how to do something; a word for a concept.


What is the difference between law and theory?

A "law" is a readily observable fact about something. It is something that is obvious and undeniable. Allow me to clear up a common misconception right now, laws are not a "higher" stage than theory, and no theory ever becomes a law. Laws are simple and obvious statements about a phenomenon that never require a second guess, or an experiment, to verify them (for example, there is a law that states that there exists an apparent attraction between all objects having positive mass...it's called the law of Gravity, and it's not just undeniable, but it's readily observable and demonstrable (by virtue of the simple fact that you are not floating about, but are anchored to the Earth)). Now, a "theory" is an advanced hypothesis. An hypothesis is a plausible, testable explanation of how a phenomenon works and/or why it works that way. Once an hypothesis has been tested repeatedly, under a variety of conditions, such that it is sufficient to convince a majority that the hypothesis is probably right ("right", in this context, means that it can be used successfully to make predictions as to how the phenomenon will behave if one conducts the same experiment(s) again), it can graduate to "theory", but it is still tested just as vigorously. A theory can be "strong" or "weak", depending on the amount of evidence there is that agrees with it, the amount of accurate predictions it's made, and the amount of experiments that have been conducted and have concluded in its favor. However, it doesn't matter how strong a theory gets (you might think of such as examples as the theory of Evolution, Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, &c), it never becomes a law. That would run contrary to the definition of "law" as readily observable and nor requiring experimenation for verification. Also, a theory may always be disproven, but it must then be replaced with a better theory.


What is the scientific definition of theory?

In science, a theory is a well-substantiated explanation that encompasses a wide range of observations, experimental results, and tested hypotheses. It provides a framework for understanding natural phenomena and making predictions about future observations.


What is an example of explanation?

Explanations are full of passive verbs. Everything is done by a mysterious invisible hand: First the milk is poured. Then the eggs are added. Science and social studies books are full of explanations. You use an explanation to find out how something is done, or how something works

Related Questions

An explanation of how a system works that seems to fit the available facts but has not yet been rigorously tested is called a what?

An explanation of how a system works that seems to fit the available facts, but has not yet been rigorously tested is called a hypothesis. It starts with an initial observation or a proposal.


Why scientists consider any hypothesis valuable?

Any idea about how an unknown phenomenon occurs, or a simpler explanation for a known one, is useful in figuring out what exactly makes it happen. If it works, it can be tested and refined to provide a better explanation; if not, it OS one further things we know doesn't work.


Is a hypothesis a tentative explanation?

A theory or a hypothesis.


What is a hypothesis in astronomy?

In astronomy, a hypothesis is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon that can be tested through observation or experimentation. It is a tentative idea or prediction that can be supported or refuted based on evidence. Hypotheses in astronomy often lead to the development of theories that help explain the behavior of celestial objects and phenomena.


Why do scientists consider any hypothesis valuable?

Any idea about how an unknown phenomenon occurs, or a simpler explanation for a known one, is useful in figuring out what exactly makes it happen. If it works, it can be tested and refined to provide a better explanation; if not, it OS one further things we know doesn't work.


What is a hypothosis?

A suggestion or proposition or possible explanation on how something works, or the mechanics of a phenomena. It's spelled hypothesis. It tells you what you think your estimation is.


What is well supported and widely accepted explanation of the way nature works?

essenceScientific lawA theory


Is a hypothesis a theory?

A hypothesis is not exactly the same thing as a theory. A hypothesis just means an idea. In terms of science, it is a possible explanation for something, that someone thinks up, but which has not yet been tested. If it is tested and it works out, then it becomes a theory. If it doesn't work out it is just a failed hypothesis. above is wrong. Hypothesis is not an idea! it is a specific research statement which can be supported or refuted, a statement specifically designed BASED on a theory. Usually includes some kind of measurable reference, such as Hypothesis: The total number of people participating in social networking in 2010 has grown since the inception of Facebook in 2004 (or whenever it was). Note, this can be supported by research by using data from each of these two dates mentioned. A theory is vague : 'Social networking is increasing.''


A theory is a hypothesis that has been shown to be correct by many experiments?

NO, A theory becomes the hypothesis and after many experiments the hypothesis can become the law of whatever is being tested and tried, be it in physics, chemistry, biology, and or math.... However everything works in theory.....


What is the adamant nature action replay code?

1207404C 00002405 This is only for Pokemon Platinum and I have not tested it yet. Hope it works! =P


How does someone form a scientific hypothesis?

The first step is to be curious about something. As your curiosity grows, you may begin to wonder about how something works, or why it changes in certain ways when certain kinds of forces act upon it. Your curiosity may lead you to start developing specific ideas about what is going on. Some of these ideas may come quickly, and some may take longer to develop. Your hypothesis is your speculation about how something actually works. One important thing about a scientific hypothesis that distinguishes it from other kinds of speculations is that the hypothesis should be testable in the real word. If you have some kind of speculation or hypothesis that by its nature cannot be tested in a tangible way, then it is not a good scientific hypothesis. Maybe you can rethink it and restructure it so that it is testable, or maybe you have to accept that your hypothesis is not very good, at least as far as science goes.


How does a scientific form a hypothesis?

The first step is to be curious about something. As your curiosity grows, you may begin to wonder about how something works, or why it changes in certain ways when certain kinds of forces act upon it. Your curiosity may lead you to start developing specific ideas about what is going on. Some of these ideas may come quickly, and some may take longer to develop. Your hypothesis is your speculation about how something actually works. One important thing about a scientific hypothesis that distinguishes it from other kinds of speculations is that the hypothesis should be testable in the real word. If you have some kind of speculation or hypothesis that by its nature cannot be tested in a tangible way, then it is not a good scientific hypothesis. Maybe you can rethink it and restructure it so that it is testable, or maybe you have to accept that your hypothesis is not very good, at least as far as science goes.