the nuclear charge experienced by valence or outer-shell electrons, diminished by the shielding effect of inner-shell electrons and also by the distance from the nucleus
The magnetic field will have no effect on a stationary electric charge. ( this means that the magnetic field is also stationary. ) If the charge is moving , relative to the magnetic field then there might be an effect, but the size and direction of the effect will depend on the direction of the electric charge as it moves through the field. If the charge is moving parallel to the field there will be no effect on it. If the charge is moving at right angles to the field then it will experience a force that is mutually orthogonal to the field and direction of the motion. You really need diagrams to properly explain this
A black hole can have either positive, negative, or neutral charge. The charge of a black hole can be acquired through the consumption of charged particles, but the overall effect of the charge on the black hole's properties is not significant compared to its mass.
A positive charge will attract a nearby negatively charged particle.Oppositely charged particles attract each other while ones with the same charge repel each other.
Yes, shielding effect varies in different periods of the periodic table. It generally increases from left to right across a period due to the increase in nuclear charge, which results in a stronger pull on the electrons in the inner shells towards the nucleus. As a result, the outer electrons feel less of the nuclear charge, leading to a stronger shielding effect.
The shielding effect trend refers to the ability of inner-shell electrons to shield outer-shell electrons from the attraction of the nucleus. As you move across a period in the periodic table, the shielding effect remains relatively constant while the nuclear charge increases, leading to stronger nuclear attraction on outer-shell electrons. This results in a decreased shielding effect down a group and an increase in effective nuclear charge.
"repulsion"
It will attract it and/or be attracted to it. Opposite charges attract.
Yes
Light itself does not have an electrical charge. However, the interaction of light with matter can generate electrical charge through processes like photovoltaic effect in solar panels or photoelectric effect in certain materials.
so someone can be in charge of something.
No measurable effect at all. The electrons which cause the negative charge have such an unbelievably small mass that billions of them cannot make any observable change to the mass.
Negatively!
Distance does not affect the charge of an object. Charge is an intrinsic property of an object that is determined by the number of protons and electrons it has. The charge remains the same regardless of the distance from other objects.
Stick the battery on your tongue. No effect. No charge. If you feel a slight electric shock you know it has a charge
Positive and negative charges would have not effect on an object without charge.
The charge conjugation operator changes the sign of all the charges in a quantum state.
nope, but the triboelectric effect create an electrostatic charge