RNA world Hypothesis.
Early man scholars rejected fossils as a means to trace human evolution because they held religious or cultural beliefs that contradicted the idea of human evolution. Additionally, fossils were not well understood or widely accepted as evidence of human ancestry at the time.
Ozone played a vital rose after appearance. It led to evolution of complex organisms.
Oxygen was the element missing from Earth's early atmosphere, which eventually accumulated due to early photosynthetic organisms. This change in the atmosphere allowed for the evolution of organisms that rely on oxygen for respiration.
Yes. Animals are composed of chemicals. Chemical evolution typically refers to stellar nucleosynthesis, the creation of elements by nuclear fusion in the cores of stars, and the synthesis of elements heavier than iron via star bursts--supernova. Biochemical evolution would refer to the formation of more complex molecules, such as the spontaneous generation of amino acids from less complex molecular arrangements.
A team of researchers led by paleoanthropologist Tim White discovered Ardipithecus ramidus fossils in Ethiopia in the early 1990s. These findings have provided valuable insights into early human evolution and shed light on our ancestors' divergence from apes.
Since we don't know how many lifes we get this question is unanswerable.
he lifes in the north pole I don't know were
we know there will be an epiode 3 but we dont know anything else
No, but i hear they eat asparagus...
Because you could save lifes. ^_^
why did the early scholars reject fossils as a mean to trace human evolution
The correct spelling is "lives." "Lifes" is not a proper spelling for the plural form of the noun "life."
The same sort of subjects as later: portraits, landscapes and still lifes.
i dont know why dont you low lifes get a girlfriend
He painted still lifes, if that is what you want to know.
evolution of oven and milling process
Herbert Spencer was the early sociologist who applied the concept of evolution to societies.