0
Absorbution is the wrong spelling for Absorption which was made by my good mate Lieth. Absorbution is the oldest definition for the first ideas of the line absorption spectra which are the Plank and Einestien great descovery in atomic physics decades ago. However, the active comrade in Drogba's gang for the scientific purposes, Lieth, wanted to retern the great glory by those people to honour them ..
What else can I help you with?
Where does obsorption take place?
In the small intestine.
Where does most obsorption take place?
In the small intestine.
Is it all right to take a multivitamin and zoloft at the same time?
I was wondering if I could take my multivitamin and zoloft at the same time. I'm worried about the obsorption of each if taken together.
What function is a taproot?
the function of taproot to absorb or to transport the nutrients from the soil over the branch of roots.....................!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!................................. !!!!!!!! :P
What is main distinguish between marginal costing and obsorption costing?
Main difference between these to accounting system is the treatment of Fixed cost... absorption costing absorb (include the fixed cost to unit prise on some reasonable basis) marginal costing only include variable cost to unit cost (cost of sale) of a product and treat fixed cost as period cost (charge t profit and loss account).. very basic example would be,,, a person John made a chair with wood, some glue and few nails.. these material cost him $ 20 / chair .. the rent he paid for the workshop is $ 50 a day(fixed cost, as he have to pay either he sale any chair or not),,, so he want to sale it at least a chair @ 20+50= $ 70 another person Locke at his neighbor with same cost sold the chair for $ 40 only.. charging $20 for material and $ 20 as contribution.. so from whom you would buy? obviously form Locke.because its cheaper.... but is Locke crazy.. who is going to pay his rent??? the answer is .. if he manage to sell 3 chairs per day which he can do easily because he is selling cheaper the the profit he earns would be as follows... total contribution $ 20/chair * 5 = $ 100 (means gross profit after all material cost of 5 chairs) rent per day = $ 50 ------ he earned a profit of = $ 50 a day after paying all costs... this is the simplest difference between marginal and absorption costing system john is using absorption costing and Locke is using marginal costing... if Locke sale 3 chairs then unit cost per chair would be total rent 50 total chair manufactured 3 fixed cost per unit 50/3 = 16.67 now the total cost per unit is (VC 20 and FC 16.67) = 36.6 sale prise of 5 chair in competition 40*5 = 200 cost of 5 chair 36.6 * 5 = 183 ----------- profit 17 with same business and with same sales volume and costs...they reporting different profits
