Her own observations and the observations of others
Mercalli waves refer to a subjective scale used to measure the intensity of an earthquake by assessing its effects on people, structures, and the environment. It is based on observations and reports of damage and is used to complement the more scientifically precise Richter scale measurement of earthquake magnitude.
The ideals based on scientifically gathered evidence emphasize the importance of empirical data and rigorous research methods in shaping beliefs and practices. This approach encourages critical thinking and relies on objective observations to inform decisions in various fields, including medicine, psychology, and environmental science. By prioritizing evidence over anecdote or tradition, these ideals aim to enhance understanding and promote effective solutions to complex problems.
experimentation. By designing and conducting experiments or making observations that can either support or refute the hypothesis, scientists can gather evidence and draw conclusions about the validity of the proposed explanation or prediction. These methods help to ensure that hypotheses are scientifically tested and validated.
"The theory was not based on accurate observations" does not describe a scientifically reasonable explanation for why the nebular theory failed to predict the existence of hot Jupiters. The actual reason is that hot Jupiters were not part of the original models due to limitations in our understanding of planet formation and migration processes.
False
what are contrived experiences?
I think you mean contrived.That is a contrived excuse.She contrived to be nearby when he walked out of class.
a contrived experience i something
The murderer contrived to construct an alibi to avoid detection.
Her story seemed contrived so no one believed her.
No
There have been no scientifically documented observations of extraterrestrial beings on the moon, although, many people believe that there may be a "moon base" on the dark side of the moon.
Important standards for comparing observations include consistency, validity, and reliability. Consistency ensures that observations are repeatable under similar conditions, while validity confirms that the observations accurately measure what they intend to. Reliability refers to the stability of results over time and across different contexts. Together, these standards help ensure that comparisons are meaningful and scientifically sound.
pat
Contrived experiences lead to a suspension of a disbelief. In other words, during the period of experience, the learner believes in the reality of the experience.
artificial, lacking verisimilitude