0
What else can I help you with?
What problems may arise in using parts of the body as standard for measurement?
Using parts of the body for measurement can be unreliable as people's body parts can vary in size. For example, using a hand's width might be different for individuals with smaller or larger hands. This can lead to inconsistencies in measurement and lack of standardization. Additionally, cultural differences in body sizes and proportions can further complicate using body parts as a standard for measurement.
Before there were standard tool to use for measurement people used?
Before standard tools for measurement were widely available, people used various methods such as body parts (e.g. foot, hand), natural objects (e.g. stones), and simple tools like ropes or sticks. These methods were often inconsistent and not accurate, leading to variations in measurement standards across different regions.
How was the body used for measurement?
In ancient times, the body was used for measurement as it was considered a reliable and accessible standard. Parts of the body, like the handspan, foot, or cubit, were used to estimate lengths and distances. This method was practical for building structures, crafting objects, and in everyday tasks before standardized units of measurement were established.
Why is the human body faulty measurement?
The human body, because it is able to grow, is a faulty system of measurement. In the old days, when people measured by palms, there would be misunderstandings among people because some people would have larger-sized palms than others. So, to solve this problem, people developed measurement units time centimetre, gram, etc.
What is the system of measurement based on referents in nature and is not with respect to human body parts?
The system of measurement based on referents in nature and not human body parts is the metric system. This system uses universal constants such as the speed of light or the mass of an atom to define units of measurement like the meter or the kilogram.
What problems may arise in using parts of the body as standard for measurement?
Using parts of the body for measurement can be unreliable as people's body parts can vary in size. For example, using a hand's width might be different for individuals with smaller or larger hands. This can lead to inconsistencies in measurement and lack of standardization. Additionally, cultural differences in body sizes and proportions can further complicate using body parts as a standard for measurement.
The Body parts used to measure length?
A king's foot used to be the standard of measurement, now there is a Bureau of Measurements in the Washington DC that has standard measurement's that everyone else uses.
What are ideal body measurements for women?
36" - Bust 24" - Waist 36" - Hips This is an universal measurement and accepted by all over the world. However, according to British measurement system, they prefer 34-24-34. This 36-24-36 are achievable mostly by Indian women but tough for the women from other parts of the world.
Which is the indian standard code describes of color shade for power plant equipments?
The Bureau of Indian Standards is the national standards body of India. The Indian standard code that describes the color shade for power plant equipment is C536 - 83.
Why is accurate body measurement important how are body measurement taken?
no
Before there were standard tool to use for measurement people used?
Before standard tools for measurement were widely available, people used various methods such as body parts (e.g. foot, hand), natural objects (e.g. stones), and simple tools like ropes or sticks. These methods were often inconsistent and not accurate, leading to variations in measurement standards across different regions.
How did standard sizes develop?
A study performed by the U.S. Army's Philadelphia Quartermaster Depot, which had collected body size measurement data on over a million recruits and conscripts. The depot organized these measurements into tables of standard body proportions.
Is 36D-28-36 realistic on a woman?
Yes, a body measurement of 36D-28-36 can be realistic for a woman, as body shapes and sizes vary widely among individuals. These measurements correspond to a specific hourglass figure, which some women naturally have due to genetics and body composition. It's important to remember that beauty and body diversity come in many forms, and there is no single standard for what is considered realistic or ideal.
Is cubit standard?
Few ancient measurements were 'standard'. Generally two people doing business agreed on the standard between them. A cubit was a body-based measurement - supposedly the length of a forearm. To the best of my knowledge, only the 'carob' was a standard measurment - as the seeds of the carob are, apparently, always the same weight.
Why is accurate body measurement important.?
accurate body measurement is important to insure the dress you will wear or buy is fit to you
Traditional dress worn by indian women?
Dress that covers body because nudity is frowned upon in Indonesia. Don't ask me how i know
Measurement of body heat is called what?
tempertaure
