Natural Selection as you probably know, is the mechanism by which a species (or genetic makeup of a breeding group) changes in response to an environmental challenge. For example, imagine a population of brown rabbits in a field. They are happy, breeding and being eaten occasionally by foxes until over time, the environment changes so that the field is covered in snow.
Now, the brown rabbits stick out and the foxes have an easy time of hunting them. Consequently, the number of brown rabbits decreases dramatically and they are threatened with extinction. The genetic mutations always present in the population (and which increase with in-breeding in small populations) throw up random variations as always but now, some are more beneficial. For instance white rabbits which used to be caught and eaten quickly before the snow came, are now much better adapted. As such, they are more likely to survive, breed and pass on their white genetic make up and hence more white rabbits are born - they are naturally selected by the snow and the foxes; their environment.
GD is also a change in genetic make up of a population however it is not stimulated by the environment. Imagine our population of rabbits again. 50% of them have blue eyes and 50% have green. The eye colour makes little difference to their survival chances and is just a natural variation. A new born rabbit will statistically have a 50% chance of blue eyes and 50% chance of green eyes.
In a big population, the proportion of blue to green is likely to stay at or around 50%. However that is not the case in a small population.
Imagine there are now only 20 rabbits: 10 with blue eyes, 10 with green. Purely by chance, some of these rabbits will not breed, or some breed more often. Let's say - by chance - one green-eyed rabbit gets run over and doesn't breed. There are 10 blues and 9 greens. That means that there are now 53% blues and 47% greens. These proportions will now have a greater impact on the consequent generation since there are more blues, there will be a greater chance of blues appearing in the next generation and less chance of greens.
Populations like this constantly vary due to any number of random events. In small populations, those random events become more important since they represent a greater proportion of the total population.
In large populations, this drift is small and frequently reversed however in small populations it is almost inevitable that one of the two (or more) traits will eventually be lost from the population.
So with NS, a specific trait increases in the population because it is better adapted to the changed environment.
With GD, a specific trait increases in the population simply because a random event caused there to be slightly more of one and less of another leading to the more populous being more likely to breed
The main difference between natural selection and genetic drift is that natural selection involves the differential survival and reproduction of individuals based on their traits, leading to an increase in advantageous traits in a population over time. Genetic drift, on the other hand, is a random process that can lead to changes in allele frequencies in a population due to chance events, rather than selection pressure.
No, natural selection works on that genetic variation presented to it.
Genetic variation is necessary for natural selection to occur. This variation provides the raw material for differential survival and reproduction, which drives the process of natural selection. Without genetic variation, there would be no differences for natural selection to act upon.
Natural selection ' selects ' from among variations. Some organisms are better suited to their immediate environment and survive and out reproduce other organisms. All these organisms are genetically variant. That is the simple connection between natural selection and genetic variation. ( that variation coming about by mutation and recombination )
Genetic change is necessary for natural selection to take place
Purifying selection removes harmful genetic variations, while positive selection promotes beneficial genetic variations in natural selection.
The main difference between natural selection and genetic drift is that natural selection involves the differential survival and reproduction of individuals based on their traits, leading to an increase in advantageous traits in a population over time. Genetic drift, on the other hand, is a random process that can lead to changes in allele frequencies in a population due to chance events, rather than selection pressure.
the difference between the 2 r that natural is the best looking or tasting and artificial is fake
Genetic variation in itself does not 'support' natural selection: it is what natural selection acts upon.
No, natural selection works on that genetic variation presented to it.
Without genetic diversity, natural selection cannot occur
Together, genetic mutation and natural selection determine in what 'direction' evolution proceeds.
Genetic variation is necessary for natural selection to occur. This variation provides the raw material for differential survival and reproduction, which drives the process of natural selection. Without genetic variation, there would be no differences for natural selection to act upon.
No, there is no genetic variation upon which natural selection can operate.
Genetic variation is important for natural selection to drive evolution because it provides the raw material for natural selection to act upon. Without genetic variation, there would be no diversity in traits for natural selection to favor or eliminate, and evolution would not be possible.
Natural selection ' selects ' from among variations. Some organisms are better suited to their immediate environment and survive and out reproduce other organisms. All these organisms are genetically variant. That is the simple connection between natural selection and genetic variation. ( that variation coming about by mutation and recombination )
Natural Selection.