There is no relation between time and mass in classical mechanics or quantum mechanics. However in relativity the mass of a particle depends on the location the particle is in a gravitational field and on the particles velocity. These alterations in mass are directly attributable to time dilation effects. i. e. time dilation and mass changes are one in the same phenomena.
Main sequence stars best obey the mass-luminosity relation. This empirical relation states that there is a direct relationship between a star's mass and its luminosity. In general, the more massive a main sequence star is, the more luminous it will be.
displacement is indirectionly propotional to time .
Look at the equation for kinetic energy.It is clear that relation between mass and kinetic energy is linear (you would get a straight line on the graph), while the relation between speed and kinetic energy is quadratic (you would get a curve, specifically a parabola).
There is no relation. Every latitude passes through every time zone.
For a short period of time they become one.
yes and yes.
The period is independent of the mass.
mass number=atomic number+no. of neutrons
The mass of reactants is equal to the mass of products.
E=mc^2
the relation between frequency and time period is ''t=1/f''
Density = mass divided by volume, measured in kg per cubic metre
There is no relationship between units of mass and either length of capacity. Units of capacity are the cubed units of length.
...and Mass
star are not as heavy as us.{might not be correct}
Main sequence stars best obey the mass-luminosity relation. This empirical relation states that there is a direct relationship between a star's mass and its luminosity. In general, the more massive a main sequence star is, the more luminous it will be.
gear and clutch relation _ when clutch is disconnect this time gear shifting thats relation