globe, spherical
An apple would make a better model of the Earth than a peach, as the apple's round shape more closely resembles the shape of the Earth. Additionally, apples are often used to represent celestial bodies due to their symmetry and size, making them a more suitable choice for representing the Earth in scale models.
An object that weighs 100 pounds on Pluto would weigh 262 pounds on Earth, assuming the same mass of the object. This is because weight is proportional to the gravitational force acting on an object, and the gravitational force is stronger on Earth than on Pluto.
In the geocentric model, the motion of the celestial bodies would occur in complex patterns around the Earth. This model posited that the Sun, Moon, planets, and stars all revolved around the Earth in circular orbits. The geocentric model was later disproven by the heliocentric model proposed by Copernicus.
Charging an earthed metal object would cause the charges to be quickly neutralized by the earth's conductor. Since the earth is a good conductor of electricity, any excess charge on the metal object would dissipate rapidly into the ground, preventing the object from holding a charge.
1000,0000,00000,00000,00000,000000,00000 times as much you would weigh on planet earth
graphical
If the Object is falling at a constant velocity the shape of the graph would be linear. If the object is falling at a changing velocity (Accelerating) the shape of the graph would be exponential- "J' Shape.
An apple would make a better model of the Earth than a peach, as the apple's round shape more closely resembles the shape of the Earth. Additionally, apples are often used to represent celestial bodies due to their symmetry and size, making them a more suitable choice for representing the Earth in scale models.
That would be the moon. We've never thought of it that way ... the only object whose status didn't change between the geocentric and heliocentric model. Thanks for showing it to us.
The Moon is the nearest natural object to Earth in space.
The moon model would be about 1/4th the size of the modeled earth.
No, the mass density of an object would not be the same on the moon as on Earth. The mass of the object would remain the same, but since the gravitational pull on the moon is weaker than that on Earth, the volume of the object would decrease on the moon, resulting in a different mass density calculation compared to Earth.
Displacement
When the Earth was formed it was molten. The forces of gravity would make it shape itself into a sphere. This shape would be "frozen" in place as the Earth cooled and solidified.
The mass of an object would remain the same on the moon as it is on Earth. Mass is a measure of the amount of matter in an object, so it does not change with location. However, the weight of the object would be less on the moon due to the moon's lower gravity compared to Earth.
That would be Earth's Moon, 'Luna'.
The amount of matter an object has, also known as its mass, would remain the same whether the object is on the moon or on Earth. Mass is an intrinsic property of an object and is independent of the object's location. However, the object's weight (the force of gravity acting on it) would be different on the moon compared to Earth due to the moon's lower gravity.