The wavelength is about 400nm, it's very easy to get the frequency with this data.
There's no reason that infrared light should move at a speed different from the speed of any other wavelength of light, or for that matter, the speed of any other form of electromagnetic radiation. The speed of infrared light is simply the speed of light in whatever medium it happens to find itself at the moment.
All electromagnetic (EM) radiation travels at the same speed in a vacuum. However in a different medium, for example a glass triangular prism, the speed depends on the frequency of the EM radiation, and on the material it travels through. Generally for transparent materials, infra-red will travel faster than visible light. This frequency dependence of the speed is what causes dispersion and can be seen in rainbows.
colour blue ------> red frequency drops, wavelength increases, because speed remains constant and speed=frequency*wavelength
Yes, the speed of violet light in glass is higher than the speed of red light. This is due to the phenomenon of dispersion, where different colors of light are refracted at different angles as they pass through a medium, causing them to travel at different speeds.
Wavelength does not change with the speed of light, nor does the speed of light change for different wave lengths. Wavelength x frequency = c (the speed of light) always for any given medium through which it travels. Greater wavelength yields lower frequency, so the speed is always the same. Speed changes as light passes into different media transparent to light, but the change in speed has nothing to do with any change in frequency or wavelength. Those are related only to the nature of the material and the particular light energies it may pass or absorb. So white light passing through a red filter emerges red because the blue and green frequencies have been absorbed by the filtering material. That change in wavelength and frequency is not related to any change in speed within the filter.
In a vacuum the speed of red and blue light are the same as all light, 300,000,000m/s. Their frequency and wavelength will be different but the speed remains the same.
speed of light is always the same, regardless of frequency/colour.
No. All colors travel at the same speed. It is called "the speed of light".
Although we can see red-it is not what is actually there-we reinterrupt a series of greys as red. It turns out we can distinguish natural light much better because we 'colour code' it. The grey we interrupt as red. It is a frequency of light, rather than an actual speed, from 630-740 nanometres.
To see a red light as green, you would have to drive at a speed faster than the speed of light, which is not possible according to the laws of physics.
Yes. Different wavelengths though.
No. Light travels at the same speed, regardless of color.
Both blue and red light travel at the same speed in a vacuum, which is the speed of light (approximately 3 x 10^8 m/s). However, blue light has a higher frequency and shorter wavelength compared to red light.
Red light cameras are usually high speed video cameras that use ambient light.
they both travel at the same speed ? :>)
Red light waves and blue light waves travel at the same speed in a vacuum, which is the speed of light (about 299,792 km/s). The perception that red light travels faster could be due to differences in how the human eye perceives the colors or how the waves interact with materials.
In vacuum, such as in space, red light travels at the same speed as a Channel 47 digital color HDTV signal. That speed is 299,792,458 meters per second, or 186,282 miles per second.