When we talk about "burning" it generally means a chemical reaction with oxygen from the air, which produces heat. Nuclear scientists and engineers also talk about "burning" or "burnup" of the nuclear fuel, in this case there is no fire or chemical reaction, so perhaps this is what you have in mind.
Fire Water Burn was created in 1996.
No, fire does not need carbon to burn. Fire requires three elements to ignite and sustain: heat, fuel, and oxygen. Carbon is a common fuel source for fires, but other materials like wood, paper, and gas can also serve as fuel for combustion.
A substance would only burn in a vacuum if it contained an oxidizer. There has to be an oxidizer for there to be fire. That doesn't mean that it requires oxygen, just a substance that facilitates the removal of electrons.
you burn.....
Yes.
for wood to burn you need fire
oxygen
No it can't. You need oxygen to burn for it to work.
yes it does
You can boil the water and then stick your hand in it. For the wash with fire, create your fire, then place a pot of water slightly elevated above the fire and boil the water, then stick your thing in need of cleaning in the pot of boiling water
you need fire (torch) to burn it to the ground.
No. Fire need fuel, oxygen, and heat to burn. Carbon dioxide is a product of most fires and can actually be used to put fires out.
Fire can burn still. Now I am not saying you can go up to a piece of still and light it on fire, you would need a really high temperature to do it.
throwing a blanket over a small contained fire stops oxygen to the fire .to stop a fire you need to take out one of the three elements that are needed for a fire to burn witch are heat /oxygen/fuel
No, but someones pants got on fire (True thing)
No. Flour will put a fire out but for a burn ice is the best thing. It hurts a little at first but it will stop the pain and reduce or stop the blistering.
Fire...I'm in middle school, and I know that... >=D