Cosmic background radiation.
It helped prove the big bang theory.
The astronomical telescope.
Alfred Wegener's theory was rejected because he could not prove how the continents actually moved. He showed evidence of fossils from Africa and South America, but still coul not prove the convection surrents going on underground. Other geologists did not believe in his theory just because he was a meteorologist, not a geologist like themselves.
Scientists cannot prove their findings definitively because science is always open to new evidence and interpretations. Instead, findings are supported by evidence and reproducibility, increasing confidence in their accuracy but never being completely certain. The goal of science is to continually refine and improve our understanding of the natural world based on the best available evidence.
You tell me.
probably when you can prove it
Scientists prove a theory by conducting experiments, making observations, and collecting data that support the theoretical predictions. Consistent and reproducible results from these experiments provide evidence to support the theory. Additionally, peer review and scrutiny by other scientists help validate the theory.
Well, at the time it was proved, it was a theory. Then, Arno Penzias, a nobel laureate, and a physicist, found cosmic background radiation, which helped to prove what happened when there was a gigantic explosion.
Alfred Weneger was trying to prove his theory of Continental Drift. Many other scientists before him had the same theory, but they never could prove it. He had five pieces of evidence.
There was no evidence to prove it
many differnet scientists doing expiraments that prove the hypothesis to be true-then it becomes a theory
It helped prove the big bang theory.
A scientist can prove a theory by conducting experiments, collecting data, and analyzing results to see if they consistently support the predictions made by the theory. The more evidence that aligns with the theory's predictions, the stronger the support for the theory. Additionally, peer review and replication of results by other scientists help confirm the validity of a theory.
It is another example that helps scientists with their theory that all of Earth's landmasses (land) were/was once connected. WOOOOOOOOOT WOOOOOOOOOOT
Scientists do not prove things. Lamarck's theory is long refuted as acquired characteristics and the use and disuse concepts are not explanations for evolution of populations.
Hypotheses are useful because they can be tested, and scientists love to test to prove if whether your theory is right or wrong.
The astronomical telescope.