A black hole can not be truly seen but what astronomers do look for manly is the event horizon it is the very edge of the black hole ... the event horizon is noticed when light droops and bends in to the black hole ...
no dude, the evidences of the existence of black holes is now widely accepted and i believe that black holes rules our universe but it is difficult to find them because black holes are nearly the perfectly black bodies
He did not discover them. He did some calculations that predicted the possibility of the existence of black holes.
The lack of direct evidence for black holes poses a challenge for scientists because black holes, by their nature, do not emit any light or radiation that can be easily detected. Instead, researchers must rely on indirect observations and theoretical models to infer the presence of black holes. This makes it difficult to conclusively prove their existence through direct observation.
The density of matter just after the big bang is calculated to be sufficient to have spontaneously created black holes; such are called primordial black holes, and searches for their existence are ongoing.
Black holes can't be seen but you can see how something affects the area around the black holes, so that's really how they found a black hole. Karl Schwarzchild is the man most often attributed with having discovered the black hole with a telescope. how is that possible if you can't see a Black hole, how can you see it with a telescope?
The effect of the existence of black holes is supported by observational evidence. There have as yet been no observations that would support the existence of the other items on this list.
no dude, the evidences of the existence of black holes is now widely accepted and i believe that black holes rules our universe but it is difficult to find them because black holes are nearly the perfectly black bodies
He did not discover them. He did some calculations that predicted the possibility of the existence of black holes.
The lack of direct evidence for black holes poses a challenge for scientists because black holes, by their nature, do not emit any light or radiation that can be easily detected. Instead, researchers must rely on indirect observations and theoretical models to infer the presence of black holes. This makes it difficult to conclusively prove their existence through direct observation.
Most likely not. The best evidence of the existence of black holes has been found deep within galaxies.
The density of matter just after the big bang is calculated to be sufficient to have spontaneously created black holes; such are called primordial black holes, and searches for their existence are ongoing.
The existence of black holes is an outgrowth or prediction of General Relativity, which was Einstein's theory of gravitation. The dominant force forming black holes is the force of gravity, a universal attraction between mass.
Black holes can't be seen but you can see how something affects the area around the black holes, so that's really how they found a black hole. Karl Schwarzchild is the man most often attributed with having discovered the black hole with a telescope. how is that possible if you can't see a Black hole, how can you see it with a telescope?
Astronomers believe that there are black holes, but I will add that they have only been observed indirectly at great distances, so it may be that the interpretation of our observations will change in the future.
Probably not. The existence of black holes can be considered to be confirmed; the existence of wormholes is highly speculative, that is, they probably don't exist at all. According to String Theory, worm hole does exist. However black holes are not warm holes. Even if you did found a wormhole, it probably going to be only about 1 atom small.
Yes, that's where they are. A black hole on Earth would utterly destroy the Earth, in a very short time.The existence of black holes is now generally accepted, by the way.
Mostly by theory and computer simulation. All observations are necessarily indirect.