distance
expanding, with galaxies moving away from each other. This expansion suggests that the universe was once much smaller and denser, and has been expanding ever since the Big Bang.
"Envidence" is not a recognized term. It may be a typo or a misspelling. If you meant "evidence," then it refers to information or objects that are used to support a claim or proposition in a court of law or in scientific research.
When Alka-Seltzer and water come into contact it creates a reaction that produces gas. This is evident by the fizzing bubbles. In order to support the law of conservation of mass you would need to capture and measure the gas.
Mendel's experiments with pea plants provided key evidence for his laws of inheritance. He observed that certain traits, such as flower color and seed shape, followed predictable patterns when he crossbred plants. The consistent ratios of dominant and recessive traits in the offspring supported his Law of Segregation and Law of Independent Assortment. These findings demonstrated that traits are inherited independently and can be predicted mathematically, laying the foundation for modern genetics.
Sometimes
distance
By using a therom call hubbles law and hubbles constant this is the calculation: 1/Ho=d/v=t t= 3.09x10 22/71000x31566926 t=13.738 billion years old
Yes, an affidavit can be used as evidence in a court of law. An affidavit is a written statement made under oath, and it is considered a form of evidence that can be presented in court to support a party's case.
Hubble's Law states that (more or less) the distance to a galaxy is a constant multiple of the distance to that galaxy. For example, if one galaxy is moving away from us at three times the speed of another galaxy, then that means it is also three times as far away. The Law indicates that the Universe is expanding and had a beginning. Before Hubble's Law, many astronomers thought that the Universe did not have a beginning (it always existed).
Everybody has diff ideas. They all think that they are right. There is enough evidence to support a theory but not a law.
expanding, with galaxies moving away from each other. This expansion suggests that the universe was once much smaller and denser, and has been expanding ever since the Big Bang.
You don't need physical evidence for proof. Just the fact that your afraid of your abuser is enough to get the law involved.
Burr W. Jones has written: 'Jones on evidence, civil and criminal' -- subject(s): Criminal Evidence, Evidence (Law) 'The law of evidence in civil cases' -- subject(s): Evidence (Law), Civil procedure 'The law of evidence'
A theory is an idea system with a lot of evidence to support it--for example, the theory of evolution. A law (in science) is an idea system with proof attached to it--no contradictions--example, the law of gravitation.
I know of no empirical evidence to support that. It sounds like some kind of propaganda from a mother-in-law...
"Envidence" is not a recognized term. It may be a typo or a misspelling. If you meant "evidence," then it refers to information or objects that are used to support a claim or proposition in a court of law or in scientific research.