It is hard to find any research scientist working in the fields of atmospheric science or climate who actually believes there has not been a rise in average global temperatures since the beginning of the Industrial Age. Richard Lindzen, a professor of Atmospheric Science but widely regarded as a contrarian, agreed that global warming is occurring and could be caused by increased carbon dioxide (CO2) levels but believed that scientists were not in a position to prove the connection. Garth Paltridge, retired Chief Research Scientist at the CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research, agreed that there are good reasons to believe that burning fossil fuels could lead to global warming, but was uncertain as to how significant this would be.
Richard Muller, a Physics Professor and longtime critic of climate studies, set out to address what he called "the legitimate concerns" of sceptics who believe global warming is exaggerated. But Professor Muller unexpectedly told a congressional hearing the work of the three principal groups that have analysed the temperature trends underlying climate science is "excellent ... We see a global warming trend that is very similar to that previously reported by the other groups." It appears that Muller no longer believes that global warming is not real.
The overwhelming consensus among climate scientists is that global warming is real and primarily caused by human activities. While there may be a small minority of scientists who question the extent or causes of global warming, the consensus and evidence supporting the reality of climate change are robust.
Global warming and climate chang
Well, for one, there is a lot of controversy over this topic. Many think global warming is produced by cars, trains, etc. Others think it is just the climate changes that cause global warming. Others think there is none at all. Here is the silly thing. Scientists presently are saying that global warming is a problem. However, a little less than a century ago, scientists were scared that an ice age would end the world. That is probably why it is complicated, because there are so many viewpoints. Hope this helps
Not necessarily, as belief in evolution and belief in global warming don't really have anything to do with each other. That said, a person who believes in evolution is probably more likely to believe in global warming, as they tend to listen to what scientists say, and scientists are the biggest advocates for global warming being real.
Scientists and environmentalists are warning the world that global warming is a real and present danger. Politicians can rarely see beyond the next election in three or four years. Few of them, in the US anyway, have any long term vision.
Approximately 97 of climate scientists believe in global warming.
Approximately 97 of scientists believe in man-made global warming.
According to multiple studies, less than 3 of scientists do not believe in global warming.
The overwhelming majority of scientists agree that global warming is real. Multiple studies have shown that around 97 of climate scientists support the consensus that human activities are causing global warming.
Because it is GLOBAL, not local warming.
Yes, approximately 97 of scientists agree that global warming is happening and is primarily caused by human activities.
Yes, the majority of scientists agree that global warming is happening and that it is having a significant impact on the environment.
The consensus among scientists is that global warming is real and supported by 97 of them.
The work of 15 climate scientists is helping to educate the public about the overwhelming scientific evidence for human-caused global warming.
Yes, approximately 97 of climate scientists agree that global warming is happening and is primarily caused by human activities.
Global warming is no longer a theory, as it is accepted as fact by the vast majority of climate scientists.
The overwhelming consensus among climate scientists is that global warming is real and primarily caused by human activities. While there may be a small minority of scientists who question the extent or causes of global warming, the consensus and evidence supporting the reality of climate change are robust.