A red star can be more luminous than a bluish-white star if it is larger in size and/or hotter in temperature. The luminosity of a star is determined by its size and temperature, with larger and hotter stars emitting more energy. Therefore, a red star that is larger and hotter than a bluish-white star can be more luminous.
The name of the north star is Polaris. As the brightest star in the constellation of Ursa Minor it is also called alpha Ursae Minoris. It is actually a multiple star comprised of Polaris Aa, Polaris Ab and Polaris B.
Polaris and the North Star are the only two names I know.
In the main sequence, as the temperature of a star decreases, its luminosity also decreases. This relationship is explained by the Stefan-Boltzmann Law, which states that a star's luminosity is proportional to the fourth power of its temperature. Therefore, cooler stars emit less energy and light compared to their hotter counterparts. As a result, lower temperature main sequence stars, such as red dwarfs, are significantly less luminous than hotter stars like blue giants.
Generally the main star as this will have the most mass. However, temperature is not necessarily based on mass, so a secondary unit, could well be hotter but less massive.
Yes luminous actually for a star to get hotter.
A red star can be more luminous than a bluish-white star if it is larger in size and/or hotter in temperature. The luminosity of a star is determined by its size and temperature, with larger and hotter stars emitting more energy. Therefore, a red star that is larger and hotter than a bluish-white star can be more luminous.
No. The definition of a star is "any of the large, self-luminous, heavenly bodies, as the sun, Polaris, etc." Mercury is a planet that orbits a star - our sun.
Luminosity is related to temperature and distance.A cool and thus less luminous star would be brighter than a more luminous star at a greater distance.Our Sun is a relatively cool star in comparison to say Rigel, but because it is closer it appears more luminous and brighter.
Blue stars are hotter, larger, and more luminous than red stars. They have shorter lifespans due to their high energy output. Red stars are cooler, smaller, and less luminous, and they have longer lifespans.
Rigel appears as bright as Betelgeuse because it is hotter and more luminous, even though it is smaller. The luminosity of a star depends on both its temperature and size, so a hotter, more luminous star can shine as brightly as a larger, cooler star.
Rigel is approximately 120,000 times more luminous than the Sun. It is a blue supergiant star, which is much larger and hotter than our Sun, resulting in its high luminosity.
One star may appear brighter than another star due to several factors, including its size, temperature, distance from Earth, and luminosity. A larger, hotter, closer, or more luminous star will typically appear brighter in the night sky compared to a smaller, cooler, more distant, or less luminous star.
Sirius is the brightest star...Polaris is bigger then Sirius, Polaris is 360 to 820 light years away from earth, and Sirius is only 8.6 light years away. The Sirius star is known as the dog constalation, The polaris star is found at the tip and corner of the big dipper and the little dipper
The present star is in the late stages its life as Polaris. In the Roman Era, the North Pole was more or less equidistant from Kochab and the present Pole Star. In the year 3000, Alrai will be closer to the Celestial Pole and the present star will cease to be Polaris.
The name of the north star is Polaris. As the brightest star in the constellation of Ursa Minor it is also called alpha Ursae Minoris. It is actually a multiple star comprised of Polaris Aa, Polaris Ab and Polaris B.
The common name for Polaris, the North Star, is simply "Polaris."