A meteorologist.
To some degree, yes. Factors such as ocean surface temperatures and wind shear are measured to determine the likelihood that a hurricane will develop, and to make predictions about its intensity if one does develop. Analysis of wind currents can be used to make predictions about the path of a hurricane. However, there is still a significant margin for error and many storms still act unexpectedly.
no you can make a gess but it might not be true
Scientists can use computer simulations, mathematical models, and observational studies to test predictions for situations where experiments are impossible or unethical. These methods allow researchers to make predictions based on existing data, theories, and principles without conducting actual experiments.
A meteorologist.
Scientists rely on fossil evidence to make predictions about the size and shape of animals because fossils provide physical remnants of organisms that lived in the past. These remnants, such as bones, teeth, and imprints, allow researchers to reconstruct the anatomy and estimate the dimensions of extinct species. However, soft tissues and coloration are rarely preserved, limiting scientists' understanding of the full biological and ecological characteristics of these animals. Consequently, predictions are based on the available fossil data and comparisons with closely related species.
A meteorologist.
It depends entirely on where the HAARP Scientists want to steer the hurricane.
A meteorologist would be the type of scientist who makes predictions about the path of a hurricane. They analyze weather patterns and use specialized tools to forecast the movement and intensity of hurricanes.
...to make predictions. Scientists will then compare their predictions to what happens in the real world. If their predictions equaled what happened in reality, the model is good. If the predictions were different, the scientists know they have to refine the model to better predict what will happen.
Scientists make predictions with a hypothesis. Using their observations, models, and other scientists' work, they create a statement of a possible outcome called a hypothesis. Then scientists design tests to check whether their prediction was true.
To some degree, yes. Factors such as ocean surface temperatures and wind shear are measured to determine the likelihood that a hurricane will develop, and to make predictions about its intensity if one does develop. Analysis of wind currents can be used to make predictions about the path of a hurricane. However, there is still a significant margin for error and many storms still act unexpectedly.
Maybe It will hit, but such predictions are impossible to make.
No, scientists can't make a hurricane change direction. As it is, we still have trouble even predicting the path a hurricane will take. We are not even on the level of influencing what a hurricane will do.
The hypothesis ithink
No, scientists can't make a hurricane change direction. As it is, we still have trouble even predicting the path a hurricane will take. We are not even on the level of influencing what a hurricane will do.
becoz dey wana see if der ges is right
Its ability to make predictions which can be tested.