answersLogoWhite

0

The conflict between science and religion in 19th century was about the creation accounts.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Natural Sciences

What religion is the closest to science?

Buddhism


How is Galileo remember today?

Galileo Galilei is remembered today as a pioneering figure in the history of science, particularly for his contributions to astronomy, physics, and the scientific method. His use of the telescope led to groundbreaking discoveries, such as the moons of Jupiter and the phases of Venus, which challenged prevailing geocentric views. Galileo's advocacy for empirical observation and experimentation laid the groundwork for modern scientific inquiry. Additionally, his conflict with the Catholic Church highlights the tension between science and religion during the Renaissance, making him a symbol of intellectual freedom.


Science can never answer questions about what?

Science can only answer questions about the natural world and how it works. Questions about philosophy, ethics, religion or the supernatural do not lend themselves to empirical analysis.


What makes science different from other disciplines of inquiry like religion and philosophy?

Science relies on empirical evidence and systematic observation to understand the natural world, while religion relies on faith and spiritual beliefs, and philosophy involves critical thinking and reasoning to explore fundamental questions about existence and knowledge. Science aims to test hypotheses through experimentation and verification, while religion and philosophy often rely on personal experiences or abstract reasoning.


What did the Eighteenth and nineteenth century Romantics called the Dismal Science?

The Eighteenth and nineteenth century Romantics called economics the "Dismal Science" to criticize its focus on utilitarianism and materialism, which they believed ignored the beauty and spiritual aspects of life. The term was coined by Scottish writer Thomas Carlyle.

Related Questions

Briefly discuss the conflict between SCIENCE and RELIGION in 19th century?

The main conflict between science and religion is that science requires solid evidence of the Biblical events while religion is based upon faith in knowing that because the Bible is the word of God it is true and the events took place because the Bible says they did. Science does not simply accept the fact that because God said it in the Bible it is true. They would have to see it to believe it and not act upon faith.


What are some popular books one can purchase which delve into the relationship between Science and Religion?

There are many books that delve into the relationship between science and religion; however, many of these books have a bias towards science or a bias towards religion. Some books that delve into the relationship between science and religion are "Science and Christianity: Conflict or Coherence?" by Henry F. Schaefer III and "Rock of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life" by Stephen Jay Gould.


Is there a big word for the conflict between science and nature?

A:There is no conflict between science and nature. Science is what we learn about nature.


What trail caused conflict between religion and science?

The theory of evolution proposed by Charles Darwin in the 19th century caused conflict between religion and science, particularly with creationist beliefs. This theory challenged traditional religious beliefs about the origins of life on Earth and led to debates about faith versus scientific evidence. The conflict between religious beliefs and scientific theories continues to be a topic of controversy in some communities today.


What was the conflict between science and religion in the 1920s?

In the 1920s, a major conflict emerged between science and religion in the United States over the teaching of evolution in schools. This debate culminated in the famous Scopes Monkey Trial in 1925, where a high school teacher was tried for illegally teaching evolution in Tennessee. The trial highlighted the tensions between religious beliefs and scientific theories on the origins of life.


How was science and religion like in the early 1400s like?

Religion and science had no conflict. Science was a way of discovering all the beautiful complexity of the world God made. nuff sed.


What caused conflict between science and the romantic Catholic Church?

The birth and growth of science led to the conflict between scientists and the church.


Why did the Islam's want to follow this religion?

Islam is the truth and doesn't conflict on science


How does science and religion conflict?

Science relates to Natural Law. Religion depends on Supernatural Law (outside of Natural Laws). " Four centuries before the birth of Christ, Greece was fast outgrowing her ancient faith. Her philosophers, in their studies of the world, had been profoundly impressed with the contrast between the majesty of the operations of Nature and the worthlessness of the divinities of Olympus. Her historians, considering the orderly course of political affairs, the manifest" see link History of the Conflict between Religion and Science / By John William Draper"below


Why is there a debate between science and religion?

There's nothing special about opposing points of view. There are debates between science and science, and debates between religion and religion as well. For as long we don't know all the absolute truths, and possibly even after that, people will disagree.


How did achievements in science and technology contribute to secularization in the ninetheenthe century?

The achievments in science and technology contributed to the secularization in the nineteenth century because of their marginalization of religion and replacement of supernatural ideas.


What are some arguments that science and religion do not conflict?

The main argument claiming that there is no conflict between science and religion is basically that God is a scientist, or at least works with science... that he understands and uses the forces of the universe to do what he does. As it has been throughout Earth's history, what looks like magic to one group is actually the technology of the other. If God knows everything, which is part of the definition of God, then what he does looks impossible and miraculous to us, but it is explainable once we get to a sufficient level to understand it.