The hawk, depending on where it Is in the food chain, will decrease the amount of animals below it i.e. rabbits, squirrels, ect. and/or it will be over populating the animal above it on the food chain therefore making the food chain and way of life not balanced.
right after it eats the snake it is the highest on the food chain
there would be less nutrients for the plant.
because living and None has a coniction with each other..... Living things, with out realizing it, need certain organisms to keep order. Meaning, if there was too many snakes because the population of the hawk decreased then it would go like this: If the Hawk Population was to decrease then... Snakes would increase, small rodents would decrease, and plants would increase. In a way they work together keeping it from being over populated.
In the food chain you provided, the producer is the flower. Producers are organisms that can create their own food through photosynthesis, and flowers, as part of plants, fall into this category. The mouse, snake, and hawk are all consumers, with each representing different levels in the food chain.
Producers, such as plants, are the organisms in a food chain that add energy to every part of the chain. They do this through the process of photosynthesis, where they convert sunlight into energy that can be used by other organisms in the food chain.
The mouse population will increase
The mouse population will increase. (apex)
The mouse population will increase. (apex)
A. The populations of hawks and rabbits will decrease.B. The populations of hawks and rabbits will increase.C. The population of hawks will increase. The population of rabbits will decrease.D. The population of hawks will decrease. The population of rabbits will increase
Hawk prey would decrease, and hawk predators would increase, making hawks decrease again. So to put it in context... Hawks eat mice, right? So the mouse population would increase, meaning more food for other animals that eat mice, like owls. So the owl population would increase, making mice decrease. Then animals that might eat hawks (I don't know if anything does) would increase, and eat all of the hawks then everything would eventually even out again.To answer your question, lots of things will happen, but it will all even out again.
The hawk population will dwindle.
the snake the fox , the hawk will have nothing to eat
The hawk needs a larger population of blackbirds to ensure a stable supply of food. If the hawk's population were to exceed that of the blackbirds, it would risk exhausting its food source and facing starvation. By having a larger blackbird population, the hawk can sustain itself and maintain a balance in the ecosystem.
If you took the hawk out of the food chain, the animals that the hawk preys on would become over populated. This would mean that the animals and plants that the hawk's prey eats, would be used up. The prey animals such as the Blue bird would begin to go hungry. The delicate balance of nature would be thrown off.
Theanwer is hawk to snake to mouse to grass
Gertrude Hawk Chocolates's population is 550.
hawk