A plant cell has a well defined cell wall whereas an animal cell is devoid of cell wall.
A chloroplast would be indicative of a plant cell rather than an animal cell. Chloroplasts are responsible for photosynthesis, converting sunlight into glucose, and are found in plant cells but not in animal cells.
Plant cells are selected to demonstrate plasmolysis because they have a cell wall that maintains the structure of the cell even when the cell membrane shrinks due to water loss. Animal cells do not have a cell wall, so they would burst instead of undergoing plasmolysis in a hypertonic solution.
A plant cell has chloroplasts and a cell wall, which an animal cell doesn't have.
Plant cells only, animal cells do not contain chloroplasts or chlorophyll.
i think it's because the plant cell and the animal cell are the same
A chloroplast would be indicative of a plant cell rather than an animal cell. Chloroplasts are responsible for photosynthesis, converting sunlight into glucose, and are found in plant cells but not in animal cells.
A chloroplast.
A plant cell has a well defined cell wall whereas an animal cell is devoid of cell wall.
A chloroplast = where chlorophll is made A permanent vacuole = where cell sap is stored A cell wall = helps keep the shape of a cell
The water from the cactus could be cleaner.
it would be a plant
This would be a parasite.
Plant cells are selected to demonstrate plasmolysis because they have a cell wall that maintains the structure of the cell even when the cell membrane shrinks due to water loss. Animal cells do not have a cell wall, so they would burst instead of undergoing plasmolysis in a hypertonic solution.
it isn't good, it would destroy the plant/animal.
A plant cell has chloroplasts and a cell wall, which an animal cell doesn't have.
The organelle that you would expect to find in a plant cell but not animal cell is the centrosomes.
Plant cells have a large vacuole, which the animal cells don't.