1) Even without the moon we would still get tides. The tides are caused by both the sun and the moon equally. Solar tides would only be half as high as normal tides, and they would occur with a regular 12 hour rhythm rather than the monthly rhythm we get now.
2) It would be almost impossible for complex life to survive without the moon. The moon locks the Earth into a stable position WRT the sun. As a result the equator always faces a the sun and the poles have always been perpendicular. Planets that lack large moons wobble, and at times the poles face the sun and the equator rotates perpendicular to the sun. At those times the temperature and light extremes would exterminate all complex life forms.
We don't know how long the Earth would remain in a perpendicular orientation without the moon, but some time within the next half million years it would tip. When it did all surface life would die. Life would still be possible but every time the axis moved too far from perpendicular it would have to start afresh from deep sea bacteria.
3) We have only one moon, and a very large moon, because it resulted from a collision AFTER the Earth had solidified. That collision tore off a huge chunk of the Earth and hurled it into orbit. In contrast the moons of other planets are either comets that have become trapped in orbit or were formed from the solar gas cloud BEFORE the planet itself formed.
The effects are the moon phases, eclipses, and the high tide and low tide.
It's true that there is no atmosphere on the moon, so studying the stars with a telescope would in some ways be better as there would no atmospheric effects that you would get from earth based telescopes. It's debatable whether it would be better overall though as it would be rather impractical to put such a lab on the moon.
whebwiqhfhugaufhu
The main prospects of an observatory on the moon is that there would be less artificial light from human activity to cloud the visible light from stellar objects, and also, having no atmosphere means there would be less interference of the image that a telescope/observatory would be trying to see.
major massive destructions
two tidal bulges
There would not be a difference in the effects between a new moon and a full moon. However, the effects of the storm hitting at high tide during a full moon or new moon will be worse than at high tide during a half moon.
Short!. As it turns out, gravity is important to maintaining a healthy body, and the astronauts are trying to figure out how to stay out in space longer without having the ill effects. You might expect to have a life span of a few years. If you were confined to the moon with someone who didnt like you, even shorter.
what are the effects of tides The moon effects the tides making them either high or low tides.
The effects are the moon phases, eclipses, and the high tide and low tide.
The Moon.
The Moon is largely responsible for the tides (the Sun also effects them but to a lesser extent). The Moon also provides light at night.
The effects are the moon phases, eclipses, and the high tide and low tide.
Neglecting the effects of air resistance, it would empty just like on earth only it would be slower. The time it takes would be proportional to the ratio of the mass of the moon to the mass of the earth.
Because the phases of the moon are Half Full and Half full.
A nonexample of a sun would have to be the moon.
chronologiacal order !