Then people couldn't live on it, or even visit without some massive shielding or temperature / radiation controls and breathing apparatus.
It cannot, a star can only have one or no habitable zone. Actually, many stars in the universe have none (or very, very inferior ones.) There are various reasons; one of them being that most stars exist in groups of two or more, making it difficult for a planet to have a stable orbit with just the right amount of constant starlight to be habitable.
Luminosity affects the habitable zone (CHZ) by determining the distance at which a planet would need to be from a star to have the right temperature for liquid water to exist on its surface. Stars with higher luminosity would have habitable zones farther out, while stars with lower luminosity would have habitable zones closer in. This means that the size and location of the CHZ around a star depend on its luminosity.
None that are known. There may be a roughly Earth-sized planet in orbit around Alpha Centauri B, but this planet, if it exists, would be far too hot to support life.
There is no planet named Goldilocks. A Goldilocks planet is any planet that orbits in a star's habitable zone, that is at the right distance that it has a chance of being the right temperature to support liquid water. The description does not necessarily mean anything about what the surface is like.
If you mean, which planet could we just open the doors, plant a few vegetables and get on with life, then none - so far. Mars could be habituated but not without problems. No air or soil would be a major problem. At first everything would have to under domes, somehow protected against meteor strikes.
Temperature is one factor that makes an environment habitable for a species.If Earth were destroyed, humans would have to locate another habitable planet.
The habitable zone is that zone in which water is liquid. Without liquid water, life as we know it would not be possible.
No, there would have to be an atmosphere and water as well.
Nothing important occur.
It cannot, a star can only have one or no habitable zone. Actually, many stars in the universe have none (or very, very inferior ones.) There are various reasons; one of them being that most stars exist in groups of two or more, making it difficult for a planet to have a stable orbit with just the right amount of constant starlight to be habitable.
None of them you would die on all of them. Mars would probably be the closest to hospitable. Once it had rivers and thousands of years ago however now it is dry. There are some planets are hospitable but most of them are in other galaxys Earth is the only habitable planet.
Luminosity affects the habitable zone (CHZ) by determining the distance at which a planet would need to be from a star to have the right temperature for liquid water to exist on its surface. Stars with higher luminosity would have habitable zones farther out, while stars with lower luminosity would have habitable zones closer in. This means that the size and location of the CHZ around a star depend on its luminosity.
Nothing No One Can Hit A Planet
If a dwarf star crashed into a planet,the planet would likely explode.
None that are known. There may be a roughly Earth-sized planet in orbit around Alpha Centauri B, but this planet, if it exists, would be far too hot to support life.
That would be mars because it has ice on a side of it,so if we " crack " the ice we would be able to create oxygen and create our own atmosphere.
"Making" a new Earth, in the sense of building a new planet, would be extraordinarily difficult and time consuming. It would certainly be easier to terraform Venus and Mars in our own solar system, and to build habitable structures on Ganymede and Titan. In the long run, we will probably discover habitable planets orbiting other stars and colonize THEM before we would be able to build a new planet to order.