the world would be peacful in most ways.
The actional potential would not reach the axon terminals.
If microorganisms were eliminated from Earth, it would disrupt many ecosystems as they play key roles in nutrient cycling, decomposition, and maintaining soil health. This could lead to a loss of biodiversity, reduced crop productivity, and environmental imbalances. Additionally, microbial activity is essential for human health, affecting processes such as digestion and immunity.
The details depend on what strange physics you make up, to replace the action-reaction force pairs.
If all producers were eliminated, there would be no source of food or resources at the base of the food chain. This would lead to the collapse of ecosystems as consumers would not have any energy source to survive. Ultimately, it would disrupt the balance of nature and lead to widespread extinction.
If you completely eliminated cholesterol from your diet, it would not have a detrimental impact on your health. Your liver produces cholesterol naturally, so dietary intake is not necessary. However, it is important to consume healthy fats and avoid excessive consumption of processed foods high in trans fats, as these can negatively impact your cholesterol levels.
I would say False
Basically, strong affirmative action is openly using race or gender or disability, etc. as a determining factor in employment, acceptance, etc. Like when a college gives someone extra points towards an acceptance decision for being Latino. Weak affirmative action is not openly using it as a determining factor, but giving social support to those who might be discriminated against. This would be a social program that provides tutors to black students, or scholarships that only females can get. This is not a legal action, but a social one.
This is a widely debated topic, so you may see conflicting answers below.Answer 1Yes. Affirmative Action allows individuals who would normally be underprivileged the access to the institutions that would fundamentally change their economic situation and break cycles of poverty. However, in my view, Affirmative Action should be economic-based, not race/ethnicity based.
AA candidate typically refers to an Affirmative Action candidate. Affirmative Action programs are designed to increase representation of minority groups in education and employment. So, an AA candidate would be someone who is considered as part of such initiatives to promote diversity and equal opportunities.
they will die and eat burritos
You just copied the question and didn't leave anything to choose from... Good work.
not many because some are against and some are for it so in my opion i would have to say 50%
The opposite of affirmative (yes) would be negative (no).
affirmative
A denial does just that it denies the Plaintiff's allegations and the burden of proof is still on the Plaintiff to prove the prima facie case.An affirmative defense does not deny the allegations but asserts a defense that would negate the legal effect of the Plaintiff's cause of action. The burden of proof in an affirmative defense is on the Defendant.An example would be a breach of contract case. The Plaintiff claims that he had a contract with the Defendant, and Defendant did not perform the contract. A denial would say "We never had a contract" and the Plaintiff would have to prove the existence of a contract. An affirmative defense would say "Yes, we had a contract, but that was 20 years ago thus the action is barred by the 10 year statute of limitations." Then the burden of proof is on the Defendant to show that the contract falls outside of the statute of limitations period.
Well if there weren't any characters there would be no story at all. And there would be no one for the action to happen to.
Affirmative. It works with the DSI XL...but if you were to use the old outdated version for the regular DS then it would become incompatible. I hope this helped.