The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. You can get a hundred views on the subject, but none of them would be correct because the event you are asking about did not happen.
The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. You can get a hundred views on the subject, but none of them would be correct because the event you are asking about did not happen.
The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. You can get a hundred views on the subject, but none of them would be correct because the event you are asking about did not happen.
The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. You can get a hundred views on the subject, but none of them would be correct because the event you are asking about did not happen.
The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. You can get a hundred views on the subject, but none of them would be correct because the event you are asking about did not happen.
The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. You can get a hundred views on the subject, but none of them would be correct because the event you are asking about did not happen.
The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. You can get a hundred views on the subject, but none of them would be correct because the event you are asking about did not happen.
The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. You can get a hundred views on the subject, but none of them would be correct because the event you are asking about did not happen.
The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. You can get a hundred views on the subject, but none of them would be correct because the event you are asking about did not happen.
More buildings would be destroyed by fires started by lightning
If the Big Bang never took place, the universe as we know it would not exist. The universe began as a singularity and expanded rapidly from that point. Without this event, there would be no galaxies, stars, planets, or life as we know it.
Libya, Israel (or Palestine, as many people in Egypt would insist on calling it), and Sudan
There would be catastrophic flooding and water damage from the two disasters. A tsunami can itself be considered a kind of flood.
The Carbon Monoxide produced by a faulty heater - is tasteless, odourless and colourless. This could result in you literally dying in your sleep - because you would never know what's happened until it's too late !
So Egypt would not have a greater chance of being conquered.
The city of Rome was never conquered. What was conquered was most of the lands of the Western Roman Empire. What happened in 455 was that Rome was sacked by the Vandals. They did not stay in order not to have to face troops which would have been gathered around Italy to deal with them.
It never would have happened, simple as that
The Romans were resilient and would have made a comeback.
The Romans, in effect, conquered Egypt in 31 BC after the battle of Actium. However, since Octavian did not enter Egypt and take possession of the country until 30 BC, either of the two dates would be correct.The Romans, in effect, conquered Egypt in 31 BC after the battle of Actium. However, since Octavian did not enter Egypt and take possession of the country until 30 BC, either of the two dates would be correct.The Romans, in effect, conquered Egypt in 31 BC after the battle of Actium. However, since Octavian did not enter Egypt and take possession of the country until 30 BC, either of the two dates would be correct.The Romans, in effect, conquered Egypt in 31 BC after the battle of Actium. However, since Octavian did not enter Egypt and take possession of the country until 30 BC, either of the two dates would be correct.The Romans, in effect, conquered Egypt in 31 BC after the battle of Actium. However, since Octavian did not enter Egypt and take possession of the country until 30 BC, either of the two dates would be correct.The Romans, in effect, conquered Egypt in 31 BC after the battle of Actium. However, since Octavian did not enter Egypt and take possession of the country until 30 BC, either of the two dates would be correct.The Romans, in effect, conquered Egypt in 31 BC after the battle of Actium. However, since Octavian did not enter Egypt and take possession of the country until 30 BC, either of the two dates would be correct.The Romans, in effect, conquered Egypt in 31 BC after the battle of Actium. However, since Octavian did not enter Egypt and take possession of the country until 30 BC, either of the two dates would be correct.The Romans, in effect, conquered Egypt in 31 BC after the battle of Actium. However, since Octavian did not enter Egypt and take possession of the country until 30 BC, either of the two dates would be correct.
if it never happened, lots of people would be alive,America would not have hatred on Iraq and there would be no history on the Persian Gulf War
You would get the Death penalty.
Egypt would probably have been destroyed earlier.
People would have been driven out of egypt. The answer was just a prediction.
People would have been driven out of egypt. The answer was just a prediction.
People would have been driven out of egypt. The answer was just a prediction.
You could use it like this: Egypt would not be able to annex Libya. Sudan has never attempted to annex Egypt.