well, the obvious answer would be that more plants would be able to survive but the disadvantage would be that there would nothing except wind that would spread the pollens of the plants and plus there would be no 'natural' fertilizers (such as cow dung) that would help the plants grow.
Plants produce food Herbivores eat plants Carnivores eat herbivores Thus to keep everyone fed there have to be more plants than there are herbivores to eat them (or the herbivores would starve) and more herbivores than carnivores (or the carnivores would starve).
Because if the plants were all eaten up, there would be nothing left for the herbivores to eat. Also, the oxygen that the plants supplies are needed by the herbivores to survive.
If all predators were killed, herbivore populations would likely surge due to the lack of natural checks on their numbers. This overpopulation could lead to overgrazing, resulting in the depletion of plant life and disruption of ecosystems. As plants diminish, herbivores would eventually face food shortages, leading to population crashes. The overall balance of the ecosystem would be severely disrupted, potentially causing cascading effects throughout the food web.
carnivores would totally depend on herbivores to transfer energy from plants into a form of which they can eat,themselves. omnivores would partially depend as they can only transfer certain plants into energy.
Many carnivores eat herbivores, which are plant eating animals, therefore no plants in turn means no food due to the starvation of the herbivores. Also there is the whole thing of plants producing Oxygen, which is required for breathing.
if plants did not exist then all animals would have to adapt by eating only meat. there would be no herbivores or omnivores. this is bcos plants produce their own food. animals cannot
Plants produce food Herbivores eat plants Carnivores eat herbivores Thus to keep everyone fed there have to be more plants than there are herbivores to eat them (or the herbivores would starve) and more herbivores than carnivores (or the carnivores would starve).
Because if the plants were all eaten up, there would be nothing left for the herbivores to eat. Also, the oxygen that the plants supplies are needed by the herbivores to survive.
he would be killed
Yes. Elephants are herbivores and without plants they would starve.
They would be called Herbivores.
If all predators were killed, herbivore populations would likely surge due to the lack of natural checks on their numbers. This overpopulation could lead to overgrazing, resulting in the depletion of plant life and disruption of ecosystems. As plants diminish, herbivores would eventually face food shortages, leading to population crashes. The overall balance of the ecosystem would be severely disrupted, potentially causing cascading effects throughout the food web.
Well, If there were no longer plants for animals to munch on i would say how they would die of starvation, because a lot of animals are herbivores(meaning they mainly or only feed on plants) like for example cattle and sheep are herbivores.
A consumer that eats only plants is a herbivore.
If there were not any plants then the herbivores would die.Then the carnivores will die because they won't have any herbivores left.And we would die then.Also without plants we can't eat them and we need the plants.Plus we can't make some things like medicine,clothing,shelter.
carnivores would totally depend on herbivores to transfer energy from plants into a form of which they can eat,themselves. omnivores would partially depend as they can only transfer certain plants into energy.
Many carnivores eat herbivores, which are plant eating animals, therefore no plants in turn means no food due to the starvation of the herbivores. Also there is the whole thing of plants producing Oxygen, which is required for breathing.